| Author |
 Topic |
|
|
dewanand
Netherlands
267 Posts
|
 Posted-20 Feb 2004: 13:31:15   
|
Wfor0185.doc / 040220 / Rechtszaak: KORAN verbieden / 245W
Onderwerp: Rechtszaak om Koran te verbieden
Delft, 20 februari 2004
Mijne dames/ heren,
De Koran is het zogenaamde heilige geschrift van de moslims. Helaas hebben de gewelddadige teksten uit dit geschrift ervoor gezorgd dat er al minstens 500 miljoen doden zijn gevallen in naam van Allah en de Islam. Ruim 50 maal meer dan die van de Hitler doctrine. Hiertegen moeten wij iets doen, want zo kan het niet verder. Als wij niets doen dan zullen latere generaties hieronder lijden en ons vervloeken, wegens onze lafheid. Onderneem dus nu actie.
Het is de bedoeling dat wij een rechtszaak beginnen tegen de Nederlandse staat om de Koran te verbieden, ongeacht artikel 1 van de grondwet, waarin elk religieus geschrift toegestaan is, zelfs als de teksten in dit geschrift de gelovigen aanzetten tot haat, moord, verkrachting en terrorisme. In principe kan de Koran beschouwd worden als een terroristisch geschrift, van hetzelfde kaliber als Mein Kampf, welke grondwettelijk verboden is verklaard, na de excessen van de Tweede Wereldoorlog.
U kunt ons steunen om de Koran te verbieden. Wij moeten een speciale nationale organisatie oprichten hiervoor en ons krachtig organiseren om de rechtszaak op te starten. Iedereen die mee wil doen, mag ons mailen. De hele organisatie moet nog opgezet worden, dus denk er ook zelf over na en doe wat voorstellen. Elke organisatie mag ons steunen hierbij, ongeacht de gezindheid.
Steun deze aktie en bescherm uw eigen nakomelingen.
Dewanand
[email protected]
Het grondgebied der nederlanden is heilig voor elke oernederlander.
Hoeveel recht heb ik dan als (Hindoe)schrijver om dit grondgebied te ontheiligen?
Kritisch Podium Dewanand
https://www.dewanand.nl |
|
|
Tjeerd
Cayman Islands
2840 Posts
|
Posted-20 Feb 2004: 13:44:33
|
| Hoe staan moslims tegenover hindoes? |
|
|
|
Nuchter
1666 Posts
|
Posted-20 Feb 2004: 14:02:11
|
Ik ben het helemaal met je eens... Deze racistische troep dient zo vlug mogelijk verboden te worden.
"Guilty of being Dutch" |
|
|
|
|
Robert Rechtvaardig
Netherlands
1241 Posts
|
Posted-20 Feb 2004: 14:15:14
|
quote:
Originally posted by dewanand
Wfor0185.doc / 040220 / Rechtszaak: KORAN verbieden / 245W
Onderwerp: Rechtszaak om Koran te verbieden
Delft, 20 februari 2004
Mijne dames/ heren,
De Koran is het zogenaamde heilige geschrift van de moslims. Helaas hebben de gewelddadige teksten uit dit geschrift ervoor gezorgd dat er al minstens 500 miljoen doden zijn gevallen in naam van Allah en de Islam. Ruim 50 maal meer dan die van de Hitler doctrine. Hiertegen moeten wij iets doen, want zo kan het niet verder. Als wij niets doen dan zullen latere generaties hieronder lijden en ons vervloeken, wegens onze lafheid. Onderneem dus nu actie.
Het is de bedoeling dat wij een rechtszaak beginnen tegen de Nederlandse staat om de Koran te verbieden, ongeacht artikel 1 van de grondwet, waarin elk religieus geschrift toegestaan is, zelfs als de teksten in dit geschrift de gelovigen aanzetten tot haat, moord, verkrachting en terrorisme. In principe kan de Koran beschouwd worden als een terroristisch geschrift, van hetzelfde kaliber als Mein Kampf, welke grondwettelijk verboden is verklaard, na de excessen van de Tweede Wereldoorlog.
U kunt ons steunen om de Koran te verbieden. Wij moeten een speciale nationale organisatie oprichten hiervoor en ons krachtig organiseren om de rechtszaak op te starten. Iedereen die mee wil doen, mag ons mailen. De hele organisatie moet nog opgezet worden, dus denk er ook zelf over na en doe wat voorstellen. Elke organisatie mag ons steunen hierbij, ongeacht de gezindheid.
Steun deze aktie en bescherm uw eigen nakomelingen.
Dewanand
[email protected]
Het grondgebied der nederlanden is heilig voor elke oernederlander.
Hoeveel recht heb ik dan als (Hindoe)schrijver om dit grondgebied te ontheiligen?
Kritisch Podium Dewanand
https://www.dewanand.nl
laat maar eerst bewijzen zien, van teksten uit die Koran......
Laat het kwaad links liggen (Job 36:21)
|
|
|
|
|
Adeksel
Netherlands
3945 Posts
|
Posted-20 Feb 2004: 14:49:22
|
Wat er dewand.nl staat is ook staats gevaarlijk heb geamuseerd het stukje m.b.t. gepigmenteerde gelezen.
(verweesde LPF'er)
deksels |
|
|
|
|
jessy
162 Posts
|
Posted-20 Feb 2004: 18:36:02
|
quote:
Originally posted by Tjeerd
Hoe staan moslims tegenover hindoes?
Die houden niet van elkaar.
|
|
|
|
|
Nuchter
1666 Posts
|
Posted-20 Feb 2004: 18:39:29
|
quote:
Originally posted by Tjeerd
Hoe staan moslims tegenover hindoes?
Alles wat niet moslim is zijn ongelovige varkens,honden en hoeren...
"Guilty of being Dutch"
|
|
|
|
|
Tjeerd
Cayman Islands
2840 Posts
|
Posted-20 Feb 2004: 18:53:13
|
quote:
Originally posted by Nuchter
quote:
Originally posted by Tjeerd
Hoe staan moslims tegenover hindoes?
Alles wat niet moslim is zijn ongelovige varkens,honden en hoeren...
"Guilty of being Dutch"
Gelukkig. Er is nog hoop op medestanders dus.
|
Edited by - Tjeerd on 20 Feb 2004 18:53:33
|
|
|
|
|
Nuchter
1666 Posts
|
Posted-20 Feb 2004: 19:03:33
|
quote:
Originally posted by Tjeerd
quote:
Originally posted by Nuchter
quote:
Originally posted by Tjeerd
Hoe staan moslims tegenover hindoes?
Alles wat niet moslim is zijn ongelovige varkens,honden en hoeren...
"Guilty of being Dutch"
Gelukkig. Er is nog hoop op medestanders dus.
Medestanders..? dat is iets wat zij eerder van ons verwachten... Hindoes zijn al eeuwen lang slachtoffer van de islam.. Al eeuwen lang probeert de islam zijn grenzen oosterlijk te verleggen.. Dit ging ze ook voor de wind totdat ze ze stuiten op de hindoes en het sprookje over was, maar wel tenkoste van vele onschuldige slachtoffers. Slachtoffers vallen er trouwens nog steeds dagelijks door islamitisch geweld. Wist jij trouwens dat het grootste(oosterlijke) gedeelte van Afganistan 100 jaar geleden niet islamitisch was?
"Guilty of being Dutch"
|
|
|
|
|
onderzoek
197 Posts
|
Posted-20 Feb 2004: 19:22:12
|
quote:
Originally posted by dewanand
U kunt ons steunen om de Koran te verbieden. Wij moeten een speciale nationale organisatie oprichten hiervoor en ons krachtig organiseren om de rechtszaak op te starten. Iedereen die mee wil doen, mag ons mailen. De hele organisatie moet nog opgezet worden, dus denk er ook zelf over na en doe wat voorstellen. Elke organisatie mag ons steunen hierbij, ongeacht de gezindheid.
Steun deze aktie en bescherm uw eigen nakomelingen.
Reken maar op mijn onvoorwaardelijke steun, dit is een zaak die zeker gewonnen kan worden op basis van de teksten die open en bloot in de Koran staan. Ik zou willen voorstellen of te wel hier of te wel op een ander forum een forumonderdeel te beginnen met het doel de zaak voor te bereiden en een Koran analyse door te voeren om daarmee een sterke verzameling teksten aan te voeren.
Het is inderdaad zo dat de Islam en haar leerstellingen in weze staatsgevaarlijk zijn en als zodanig ook kunnen worden aangemerkt. Dit sluit ook goed aan op het voorstel dat ik vandaag gedaan heb https://www.pim-fortuyn.nl/pfforum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=24559
Hoewel het vaak bestreden wordt, of liever het niet gezien wordt, is de koran doorspekt met stellingen die niet overeenkomstig de hier geldende wetten is, bovendien is het aantoonbaar zo dat vanuit de koran als fundament wereldwijd er een enorme terreur bstaat. Zeker 90% van het wereldwijde terrorisme is van Islamitische oorsprong en is gestoeld op de leerstellingen zoals ze in de koran voorkomen.
De bewijsvoering zal niet moeilijk zijn indien er objectief met de feiten wordt omgegaan.
|
|
|
|
|
onderzoek
197 Posts
|
Posted-20 Feb 2004: 19:26:01
|
quote:
Originally posted by onderzoek
Reken maar op mijn onvoorwaardelijke steun, dit is een zaak die zeker gewonnen kan worden op basis van de teksten die open en bloot in de Koran staan. Ik zou willen voorstellen of te wel hier of te wel op een ander forum een forumonderdeel te beginnen met het doel de zaak voor te bereiden en een Koran analyse door te voeren om daarmee een sterke verzameling teksten aan te voeren.
Er kan hier gestemd worden https://www.pim-fortuyn.nl/pfforum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=24565
|
|
|
|
|
SoS
Netherlands
1682 Posts
|
Posted-21 Feb 2004: 02:10:30
|
Hoewel volledig mee eens, in ieder geval inzake de extremistische versies, maar lijkt het me geen haalbare kaart, vanwege:
1. een rechtsorde die niet meer dan 1 miljoen van haar volk in het harnas gaat jagen
2. een rechtsorde die dit op voorhand zal zien als een aanval op de geliefde multikul samenleving
3. gevaar voor internationale positie, verdragen, handelsrelaties
4. gegarandeerde uitnodiging voor megaprotesten, stakingen, enorme sociale onrust, burgeroorlog
5. gelijke monniken/kappen verhaal, de bijbel en al het andere religieuze materiaal gaan dan ook in discussie
6. iets wat je verbied zal ondergronds gaan, nog extremer, bv. aanslagen tegen de staat/initiatiefnemers etc. etc.
Kortom, gedurfd plan, maar ook gevaarlijk indien het lukt!
SoS, wie de hoofdsteden heeft, heeft het land! |
|
|
|
|
dewanand
Netherlands
267 Posts
|
Posted-21 Feb 2004: 13:03:41
|
waarom wachten, als er rechtsgeldige bewijzen zijn om deze rechtszaak te winnen?
mein kampf is ook verboden in Nederland op grond van de haatteksten. neo-nazisten worden vervolgd hierom en alle neonazistische organisaties zijn in principe verboden.
hetzelfde argument geldt dan ook voor moslims, want die kunnen ook als neonazisten beschouwd worden.
iedereen die de haatteksten uit de koran wil lezen kan mij mailen, dan stuur ik je een bestand met alle neonazistische teksten uit de koran. dit is gewoon de keiharde realiteit van de islam.
lees binnenkort mijn argumentatie om de koran te verbieden in de rubriek islam op mijn website.
dewanand
[email protected]
Het grondgebied der nederlanden is heilig voor elke oernederlander.
Hoeveel recht heb ik dan als (Hindoe)schrijver om dit grondgebied te ontheiligen?
Kritisch Podium Dewanand
https://www.dewanand.nl |
|
|
|
|
dewanand
Netherlands
267 Posts
|
Posted-21 Feb 2004: 13:10:01
|
hier een artikel in het engels, kan iemand het vertalen aub naar nederlands.
Wfor128.doc / 010913 / Islamism is neonazism / 1308W
Subject: Islamism is neonazism
Author: Dewanand of the Netherlands
https://www.dewanand.nl
wednesday 12th september 2001
Request to reader: please copy or print this article and spread it around the whole world.
After years of studying and observing muslim behaviour, inner reflections, abstract mental constitution, their narrowminded vision upon non-muslims and their daily thoughts, I discovered some disturbing facts. For many years I kept silent, but today, after the cowardly attack on the WTC in New York, I decided to publish parts of my research results.
Every normal person gets confused by only hearing the word neonazism or fascism. We all know the reality of the nazist regimes of WOII in Germany and after that big war every healthy human of this world said to him/herself:
"Never, never again, please, save the world, save my children".
In short simple steps I will reveal my knowledge about Islam. Remember as reader that I was raised as a muslim and after many years of extreme problems, I totally converted myself toward Hinduism, because Hindu people are tolerant and more developed. Hindu women accepted me as human being, in spite of my handicaps and they gave me a new belief in my future, without any rewards for themself. For me Hinduism is really advanced and the ultimate future of all living creatures on this planet, but in Hindu cultures there is no need to become the leaders or rule the world.
"Simply exist and do no harm", is typical Hinduistic thinking.
Observe the similarity between muslims and neonazism:
Similarity 1
Nazist say: "Heil Hitler"
Muslim say: "Allah ho akbar"
Observe: just the same feelings, same emotions and, same thoughts.
Similarity 2
Nazist believe that they are superior.
Muslim believe that they are superior and the chosen ones by Allah, so they will go to the muslim heaven, even if they kill and rape thousands of innocent women and children.
Observe: just the same feelings, same motives for committing crimes against humanity and same thoughts.
Similarity 3
Nazist will kill everyone in the name of their Fhrer, Adolf Hitler.
Muslim will kill every enemy that is called Haram, in the name of Allah, their symbol of muslim unity.
Observe: just the same feelings, same motives for committing crimes against humanity and same thoughts.
Similarity 4
Nazist suppressed women in brutal way, with coldbloody force. All women in Germany were sent to the kitchen after the absolute laws of the Fhrer were installed.
Muslim control women totally and condemn them to a life as underdogs, and they even have succeeded in letting women believe that they are inferior and equal to a half man.
Observe: totally no difference in treatment of women.
Similarity 5
Nazist believed in the holy book Mein Kampf, composed by Joseph Goebbels, but based upon the visions of Adolf Hitler, while he was emprisoned.
Muslim believe in holy book koran.
Observe: Just the same goal, same content, same cruel vision of future of humanity. No difference, after abstract analysis. After abstract analysis I concluded that the dark inner core of the muslim mind is the same as that of a nazist of the Nazi-empire.
There are many other similarities between muslim thinking and nazist thoughts.
One difference:
Nazist ruled for ten years, and systematically killed almost 70 percent of all jews in Europe.
Muslim empires ruled for ten centuries in India, killing 60 million Hindus. Even today muslim leaders rules in many parts of the world and everyday innocent humans suffer or are being killed. Examples: Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Iran, Sudan, Nigeria. Find more for yourself.
Therefore I want to inform the whole world that my conclusion
after deep scientific study and hard life experience is stated as follows:
1. Islam is just the same as neo-nazism.
2. The biggest LIE OF HISTORY is that Islam is a religion.
Scientific conclusion: Islam is not a religion at all.
3. IT analysis results can be stated as follows:
Islam is a hatred, binary and very destructible virus that can infect (indoctrinate) many human brains and especially destroy the youth and life of young children. It is a crime to put such a destructive thought into the mind of young children. Please protect all youngsters of today in islamic families against systematically Islamic indoctrination.
After deep meditation and reanalysation of all facts,
I advise all democratic folks and countries to undertake the following steps:
Advise 1.
Firstly forbid the koran. it is a book that spreads only hatred and narrowminded thoughts in this world and this is not good for our world society. Koran clearly mentions the abscence of world peace and stimulates the development of a global bloody jihad.
The koran is the most destructive book in the world of all civilizations on our poor planet. Such a book must be doomed for the mass. By consuming the destructive energy of the koran, every human can become a ruthless enemy of mankind.
Advise 2.
Start (global) information campaign to actively convert muslims into another religion, that is more peaceful. start by making clear that nobody must call himself muslim anymore, because it is the same as neonazism. Send many mental (priests) workers to Islamic countries to spread the peaceful religions, just like Buddhism, Sufism, Bahai, Greek mythology, Odinism, Sikhism, Jainism, Hinduism, Christianity and many others, or to Humanism. Refill the mind of all ex-muslims and eradicate this awful indoctrination within one generation.
This is the cheapest solution, and the result is almost permanently. The koran must be totally forbidden and possession of a koran must be punished.
Advise 3.
Start telling youth and children of muslim families and origins the truth about the bloody and cowardly history of islam and who mohammed and his killing gangs really were. every child has the right to know the truth and parents do not have the right to doom the future of a young innocent child. Tell these children the truth on all schools, starting with lowest reading classes or by tales. Every child is my child and that's why I am ready to fight for the rights of small innocent children.
Advise 4.
In civilised cultures mutilation of the human body is forbidden by clearly stated laws. Scientific research has already proven that circumcision is not natural and leads to traumatic experiences, sexual frustrations, agression and blocking of orgasm, by men and women. And the myth that circumsicion is hygienic is already refuted. Therefore I strongly state the advise to totally forbid (religious forced) circumsicion, without medical indication by specialists.
In Hindu culture they say:
Sathya (truth) will always win.
Only with Gyaan (knowledge) it is possible to light up the darkness of unknowing and hatred.
So please tell youngsters the truth.
It is our duty to prevent the new generation of the children out of originally muslim families, from indoctrination by destructive thoughts from the koran. We must inform the young about the dangers of islam and it is better to start today on all schools in the whole world. More cheaper and more efficient for all humans on earth. Every human being has the right to know the truth about the history of mankind and to gather the knowledge to live happily and peacefully.
Aum Shanti, Shanti, Aum Shanti. AUM.
At last. You as single human being can also join my peaceful strategy against islam. I beg you to talk with all muslims in your social network and give books about other religions to their children and tell them all the cruel and rotten facts of islam. Buy the best books with your own money and save the innocent children that are born in muslim families. If you succeed in converting the young one, than you have saved the life of my children.
Let us all cooperate and peacefully eradicate islamic doctrines out of this world. Thanks a lot.
Het grondgebied der nederlanden is heilig voor elke oernederlander.
Hoeveel recht heb ik dan als (Hindoe)schrijver om dit grondgebied te ontheiligen?
Kritisch Podium Dewanand
https://www.dewanand.nl |
|
|
|
|
dewanand
Netherlands
267 Posts
|
Posted-21 Feb 2004: 13:11:08
|
Wfor129.doc / 010923su / source=HINDUTWA, Subject: Original Citates from the Quran (Koran) which Justified Hinduholocaust / 3264W
Subject: Original Citates from the Quran (Koran)
From: "Justice Hinduholocaust" <[email protected]>
>From the Koran
Instructions to Muslims about Unbelievers
Koran 9:29
Fight those who do not profess the true faith (Islam) till they pay the jiziya (poll tax) with the hand of humility.
So here Prophet Mohammed is instructing a true Muslim to fight people of other religions until the unbelievers debase themselves and pay tax for their existence. So the greatness of Islam is revealed only when followers of other religions are humiliated.
Koran 8:12
Remember Thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): "I am with you: give firmness to the believers, I will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers, Smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger tips of them."
Here Mohammed is giving step by step instruction on how to torture and kill Kafirs if they don't follow Islam.
Koran 9:5
"Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolators wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful."
In the above verse Prophet Mohammed is clearly instructing his followers to kill the idolaters (non believers) in any brutal way possible until the idolaters submit themselves to Islam. Allah is indeed merciful !!
Koran 9:73
Prophet, make war on the unbelievers and the hypocrites and deal rigorously with them. Hell shall be their Home: an evil fate.
Here Mohammed is trying to justify his brutal acts. He conveniently claims divine justification for the expression of his hatred by saying Allah himself revealed to him personally that people of other religions are evil and belong in Hell. Therefore, according to Mohammed any barbaric act against the unbelievers is completely justified.
Koran 4:144
Believers, do not choose the unbelievers rather than the faithful as your friends. Would you give Allah a clear proof against yourselves ?
This above verse clearly states that a Muslim can only befreind a Muslim. Mohammed in order to ensure that his followers will not befriend and get influenced by people of other religions, revealed this verse. This verse
illustrates that if a Muslim befriends a Non-Muslim than the wrath of Allah will be on him. Therefore in Islam, people of other religions should be treated with contempt,disrespect and cruelty.
Koran 47:4
When you meet the unbelievers in the Jihad strike off their heads and, when you have laid them low, bind your captives firmly. Then grant them their freedom or take ransom from them, until War shall lay down her burdens.
In the above verse, Mohammed is giving detailed instruction about how to maim and torture unbelievers in Jihad. And finally when the Muslims are satisfied enough after torturing and maiming the unbelievers, they should proceed to demand ransom for the captives. All for the sake for all-merciful Allah !!
Koran 5:33-34
The only reward of those who make war upon Allah and His messenger and strive after corruption in the land will be that they will be killed or crucified, or have their hands and feet and alternate sides cut off, or will be expelled out of the land. Such will be their degradation in the world, and in the Hereafter theirs will be an awful doom; Save those who repent before ye overpower them. For know that Allah is Forgiving, merciful.
In this verse, Mohammed devises another recipe for torturing unbelievers. This particular recipe involves chopping off alternate limbs and expelling the Kafirs (people following other religions) out of the land.
Instructions to Muslims regarding Christians and Jews
Prophet Mohammed has reserved special position for certain sects of
Unbelievers in his so called "Holy Book" Koran. Those unbelievers are none other than followers of Christianity and Judaism. I have selected few verses from Koran to display what Muslims are taught and instructed as far as treating Christians and Jews is concerned.
Koran 5:51
Believers, take neither Jews nor Christians for your friends. They are
friends with one another. Whoever of you seeks their friendship shall become one of their number. Allah does not guide the wrong-doers.
In this verse Prophet Mohammed is clearly instructing his followers never to befriend a Christian or a Jew. Because if they take a Christian or a Jew as a friend, they will commit a wrong deed and Allah's wrath will be on them.
Koran 5:57
Believers, do not seek the friendship of the infidels and those who were given the Book before you, who have made your religion a jest and a pasttime...
Here "those who were given the Book before you" refers to Christians and Jews. Once again Mohammed is warning Muslims of all time never to befriend a Christian or a Jew.
Koran 5:64
The Jews say: 'God's hand is chained.' May their own hands be chained! May they be cursed for what they say!...
In the above verse Prophet Mohammed is showing his deep respect for the Jews.
Koran 9:29
Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last day, nor hold the
forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and his messenger, nor
acknowledge the Religion of Truth from among the People of the Book, until they pay the Jiziyah (tax for non-muslims) with willing submission. And feel themselves subdued.
Here 'People of the Book' refers to Christians and Jews. The 'Religion Of Truth' refers to Islam. So in the above verse Prophet Mohammed is
instructing Muslims to fight and torture Christians and Jews (who do not believe in Islamic version of God) until they pay tax to Muslims for their existence. Muslims are also strictly instructed to make the Christians and Jews feel 'subdued'. Allah is truly benign !!!
Koran 9:30
The Jews call 'Uzayr-a son of God', and the Christians call 'Christ the Son Of God'. That is a saying from their mouth; (In this) they but intimate what the unbelievers of old used to say. Allah's curse be on them: how they are deluded away from the Truth.
Here Prophet Mohammed is wishing that Allah's curse be on Jews and
Christians. And what did the Christians and Jews do for such special favour from Allah ? All they did is that out of respect and love, they called their Prophets 'son of God'.
Islamic Hell and Unbelievers
Now we will enter the Islamic Hell brought into existence by Mohammed's hallucination and weird imagination.
Koran 98:1-8
The unbelievers among the People of the Book and the pagans shall burn for ever in the fire of Hell. They are the vilest of all creatures.
Here "People of The Book" refers to Christians and Jews. So according to Prophet Mohammed, Christians, Jews and pagans are the vilest of all creatures in the world. Islam in deed holds a high respect for people of other religions !!
Koran 22:19-22:23
Garments of fire have been prepared for the unbelievers. Scalding water shall be poured upon their heads, melting their skins and that which is in their bellies. They shall be lashed rods of iron. Whenever, in their anguish, they try to escape from Hell, back they shall be dragged, and will be told: 'Taste the torment of the Conflagration!'
Here Mohammed has imagined vividly how people of other religions will be punished in Hell. By his sick and disgusting imagination, he is trying to make sure that people of other religions convert to Islam out of sheer terror of Hell. And if this terror doesn't work, then the Muslims are always instructed to convert unbelievers to Islam brutally by force in Jihad.
Koran 18:28-30
For the wrongdoers We have prepared a fire which will encompass them like the walls of a pavilion. When they cry out for help they shall be showered with water as hot as molten brass, which will scald their faces. Evil shall be their drink, dismal their resting-place.
Who are the "wrong-doers" here ? None other than the people who DO NOT follow Islam. So Prophet Mohammed here continues with his hallucination and gives the description of Islamic Hell in the form of a revelation.
Koran 40:67-40:73
Do you not see how those who dispute the revelation of God turn away from the right path ? Those who have denied the Book and the message We sent through Our apostles shall realize the truth hereafter: when, with chains and shackles round their necks, they shall be dragged through scalding water and then burnt in the fire of Hell.
Prophet Mohammed here explains what will happen to those people who choose NOT to follow his revelation "Quran"- a manual of plunder, rape and kill. So for people of other religions following scriptures other than Quran, Allah has pre-planned punishment. First they shall be dragged through scalding water with chains around their necks and then they will be burnt in the fire of Hell. Allah is truly merciful !!
Koran 43:74
..The unbelievers shall endure forever the torment of Hell. The punishment will never be lightened, and they shall be speechless with despair. We do not wrong, themselves.
Mohammed was not satisfied by just having burnt the unbelievers once in Hell. So here he is saying that the punishment is never-ending and people following other religions will be burnt in Hell forever.
Koran 55:41-52
..That is the Hell which the unbelievers deny. They shall wander between fire and water fiercely seething. Which of your Lord's blessing would you deny ?
Koran 76:1-5
For the unbelievers We have prepared chains and fetters and a blazing Fire...
Koran 73:12
We have in store for the unbelievers heavy fetters and a blazing fire, choking food and harrowing torment: on the day when the earth shall quiver with all its mountains, and the mountains crumble into heaps of shifting sand.
Once again, in the above verses, Mohammed is emphasizing that heavy fetters, choking food and hell fire are in store for the unbelievers while the Muslims enjoy the beautiful virgins and young boys in Islamic Paradise.
Koran 77:20-77:50
Woe on that day to the disbelievers! Be gone to the Hell which you deny! Depart into the shadow that will rise high in three columns, giving neither shade nor shelter from the flames, and throwing up sparks as huge as towers, as bright as yellow camels...Eat and enjoy yourselves awhile. You are wicked men..."
In the above verse, Prophet Mohammed is making sure that the people of other religions do not get any shade or shelter when they are burnt up in the Islamic Hell. Allah is also revealing to him that all people other than Muslims are basically wicked in nature.
Koran 8:73
The unbelievers give aid and comfort to each other. If you fail to do likewise, there will be disorder in the land and great corruption.
The Great Mohammed divided the Arabian society in two tight compartments: Momins and Kafirs. The word momin means believer in Mohammed and Allah. In contrast a kafir is a non-believer. The momins did not have to be better men than the Kafirs in terms of character or consciousness. Momins had only to recite the Kalima (incantation)- "there is no God but Allah and Mohammed is his Prophet." By doing that the 'momins' become qualified to kill as many kafirs as they could or pleased, looting and burning their belongings and enslaving their women and children in the process. In the above verse, Prophet Mohammed once again is telling his followers to help each other in banning up against unbelievers (people of other religions)
Koran 21:96-21:101
..The unbelievers shall stare in amazement, crying: 'Woe to us! Of this we have been heedless. We have done wrong.' You and your idols shall be the fuel of Hell; therein you shall all go down.
This verse is another instance which displays the deep respect Islam shows towards other religions. Here Prophet Mohammed is stating that people who choose to represent God by idols will be burnt in hell along with their idols. Islam is truly compassionate towards other religions !!
Koran 33:7-12
...But for the unbelievers He has prepared a woeful punishment...
Here, we find the same old blabbering by Mohammed once again regarding how unbelievers will be punished.
Koran 44:40-49
..The fruit of the Zaqqum tree shall be the unbeliever's fruit. Like dregs of oil, like scalding water, it shall simmer in his belly. A voice will cry: 'Seize him and drag him into the depths of Hell. Then pour out scalding water over his head, saying: "Taste this, illustrious and honorable man! This is the punishment which you have doubted."
Koran 52:1-52:15
..On that day they shall be sternly thrown into the fire of Hell, and a voice will say to them: 'This is the Fire which you denied...Burn in its flames. It is the same whether or not you show forbearance. You shall be rewarded according to your deeds.'
Koran 31-37
And burn ye him in the blazing fire. Further, make him march in a chain, whereof the length is seventy cubits. This was he that would not believe in allah Most high and would not encourage the feeding of the indignant. So no friend hath he here this day. Nor hath he any food except the corruption from the washing of wounds.
Koran 56:52-56
Ye shall surely taste of the tree Zaqqum. Then will ye fill your insides therewith, and drink boiling water on top of it. Indeed ye shall drink like diseased camels raging with thirst. Such will be their entertainment on the day of Requital!
Koran 69:30-37
We shall say: 'Lay hold of him and bind him. Burn him in the fie of Hell, then fasten him with a chain seventy cubits long. For he did not believe Allah the tremendous, and urged not on the feeding of the wretched. Today he shall be friendless here; filth shall be his food, the filth which sinners eat...
The above five verses contain detail description of various kinds of punishments people of other religions will undergo in Islamic Hell. They display the true respect Prophet Mohammed had for people who were not following Islam. And through these verses, Koran (the manual for plunder, rape and kill which is treated as a timeless scripture by Muslims, teaches how lowly people of other religions should be treated by Muslims regardless of time or space.
Koran 2:39
Those who reject faith shall be the companions of the Fire.
Koran 2:89-90
The curse of Allah is on the unbelievers... humiliating is the punishment.
Koran 13:13
..He hurls his thunderbolts at whom he pleases Yet the unbelievers wrangle about Allah..
Koran 58:5
Those who resist Allah and his messenger will be humbled to dust.
Koran 70:15-16
The fire of Hell will pluck out his being right to the skull..
Koran 5:10
As for those who disbelieve and deny Our revelations, they are the heirs of Hell.
The summary of the above six verses is that a person following any religion other than Islam, is automatically assigned to Hell. His good thoughts, good actions or piety are of no value until and unless he follows Islam. So if in this life, a person does not follow Islam and does not believe in Islamic scripture, Allah will store Hell-Fire, Hot water, Molten brass, thunderbolts and other humiliating punishments in the life hereafter for him.
Koran 70:39
We have created the unbelievers out of base matters.
So here Prophet Mohammed claims that all the people of other religions are basically useless and evil because they are made up of base matters. But the same people become Allah's favorite and become capable of earning Houris (Virgins) and young boys when they convert to Islam.
Koran 2:120: "Never will the Jews nor the Christians be pleased with you till you follow their religion. Say: "Verily, Isl€šmic Guidance is the only Guidance. And if you were to follow their desires after what you have received of Knowledge, then you would have against All€šh neither any protector nor helper."
Koran 3:56: "As to those who disbelieve, I will punish them with a severe torment in this world and in the Hereafter, and they will have no helpers."
Koran 3:85: "And whoever seeks a religion other than Isl€šm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers."
Koran 3:118: "O you who believe! Take not as your helpers or friends those outside your religion since they will not fail to do their best to corrupt you. They desire to harm you severely. Hatred has already appeared from their mouths, but what their breasts conceal is far worse. Indeed We have made plain to you the verses if you understand."
Koran 3:178: "And let not the disbelievers think that Our postponing of their punishment is good for them. We postpone the punishment only so that they may increase in sinfulness. And for them is a disgracing torment."
Koran 5:14: "And from those who call themselves Christians, We took their covenant, but they have abandoned a good part of the Message that was sent to them. So We planted amongst them enmity and hatred till the Day of Resurrection, and All€šh will inform them of what they used to do."
Koran 5:51: "O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as friends, they are but friends to one another. And if any amongst you takes them as friends, then surely he is one of them. Verily, All€šh guides not those people who are the wrong‰doers."
Koran 5:73: "Surely, disbelievers are those who said: "All€šh is the third of the three (in a Trinity)." But there is no god but All€šh. And if they cease not from what they say, verily, a painful torment will befall the disbelievers among them."
Koran 8:39: "And fight them until there is no more disbelief in Islam and the religion will all be for All€šh Alone..."
Koran 9:23: "O you who believe! Take not for supporters your fathers and your brothers if they prefer disbelief to Belief. And whoever of you does so, then he is one of the wrong-doers."
Koran 9:29: "Fight against those who (1) believe not in All€šh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by All€šh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not Islam as the religion of truth among the people of the Scripture, until they pay the Jizyah [religious tax] with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."
Koran 9:34: "O you who believe! Verily, there are many of the Jewish rabbis and the Christian monks who devour the wealth of mankind in falsehood, and hinder men from the Way of All€šh. And those who hoard up gold and silver, and spend it not in the Way of All€šh -- announce unto them a painful torment."
Koran 9:123: "O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that All€šh is with those who are the pious."
Koran 9:29: "Fight against those who (1) believe not in All€šh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by All€šh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not Islam as the religion of truth among the people of the Scripture, until they pay the Jizyah [religious tax] with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."
Het grondgebied der nederlanden is heilig voor elke oernederlander.
Hoeveel recht heb ik dan als (Hindoe)schrijver om dit grondgebied te ontheiligen?
Kritisch Podium Dewanand
https://www.dewanand.nl |
|
|
|
|
dewanand
Netherlands
267 Posts
|
Posted-21 Feb 2004: 13:12:25
|
Wfor130.doc / 010925tu / source=HINDUTWA / Subject: Muhammed, Islam and TERRORISM / 5503W
Subject: MUHAMMAD, ISLAM, AND TERRORISM
Main Contents:
CH 1 [Part 2] TERRORISM IN THE QURAN
Ch 2 ISLAMIC TERRORISM UPON MUSLIMS WHO LEAVE ISLAM
Ch 3 RECENT MUSLIM WRITINGS ON ISLAM AND TERRORISM
Ch 4 ISLAMIC TERRORISM IN THE WORLD TODAY, websites
Ch 5 ISLAMIC TERRORISM IN AMERICA TODAY, FEW SUMMARIES
Ch 6 Bombing the World Trade Center in New York
CH 7 ISLAMIC ACTIONS OF TERRORISM TODAY IN THE WORLD
CH 8 HOW DO MOST MUSLIMS LIVING IN AMERICA FIT IN?
CH 9 CONCLUSION
CH 10 REFERENCES
---- main text starting
CH 1 [Part 2] TERRORISM IN THE QURAN
Muhammad taught his followers to oppress or kill non-Muslims.
Generally, Jews and Christians were allowed to live as such, provided
they paid a special tax. This tax is Jizya, a tax revenue given to
the Muslims to make up for revenues they lost from no longer dealing
in pagan activities. If the Jews and Christians refused to pay this
extortion tax they would have to convert to Islam or be killed. Non
Jews or Christians (idolaters or pagans) had to convert to Islam or
be killed. Generally they didn't have the option of paying the tax.
Here is the verse that teaches Muslims to oppress Jews and Christians:
"Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor
do they prohibit what Allah and His Apostle have prohibited, nor
follow the religion of truth, (which is Islam that abolishes all
other religions ) of the people of the Book, (meaning the Jews and
the Christians ) until they pay the Jizya (the tax imposed upon them)
with willing submission and feel themselves subdued. (with
humiliation and submission to the government of Islam.) 9:29 ."
(Commentary in parenthesis is from the Tafsir Al-Jalalein. i.e., Al-
Jalalein Interpretation of the Koran.)
The order to kill Christians and Jews is in that verse. It is clear
that Muhammad ordered his followers to fight those Christians and
Jews to convert them or pay the Jizya, and if they don't convert or
pay, do you think that he told the followers to let them go in peace?
It is very clear: convert... or pay with submission ... or die.
The background for this is found in "The Life of Muhammad", op cit,
page 620,
"...."until they [the Jews and Christians] pay the poll tax out of
hand being humbled", i.e. as a compensation for what you fear to lose
by the closing of the markets. God gave them compensation for what He
cut off from them in their former polytheism by what He gave them by
way of poll tax from the people of Scripture."
Muhammad told his followers to attack the Jews and Christians. If
they humble themselves and submit to the Muslims, but choose to
remain Christian or Jewish, then they would have to pay the Muslims.
Again, Muhammad's circumstances changed - Allah changed. Now Muhammad
was an extortionist.
Also note that the tax levied upon the Christians and Jews was not to
support the state in general affairs, it was to compensate the
Muslims. Muhammad was exactly like Mafia crime boss, making others pay for "protection".... except, the Christians and Jews really
needed protection from the Muslims!
Here is the verse in the Quran that teaches Muslims to attack and
kill pagans:
"When the sacred months are over, slay the idolaters wherever you
find them. Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere
for them. If they repent and take to prayer and render the alms levy,
allow them to go their way. God is forgiving and merciful." Sura 9:5
The background for this verse is found in "The Life of Muhammad", op
cit, page 617-619. Note my comments are in [ ] type brackets, and
that it is a very long passage, so I have only quoted part of it:
"A discharge came down, [Muhammad received a supposed revelation from
God], permitting the breaking of the agreement between the apostle
and the polytheists that none should be kept back from the temple
when he came to it, and that none need fear during the sacred months.
That there was a general agreement between him and the polytheists;
meanwhile there were particular agreements between the apostle and
the Arab tribes for specified terms. And there came down about it and
about the disaffected who held back from him in the raid on Tabuk, [a
Christian town Muhammad attacked, and forced them to pay
him], .....So travel through the land for four months and know that
you cannot escape God and that God will put the unbelievers to shame.
And a proclamation from God and His apostle to men on the day of the
greater pilgrimage that God and His apostle are free from obligation
to the polytheists, i.e., after this pilgrimage. So if you repent it
will be better for you; and if you turn back know that you cannot
escape God. Inform those who disbelieve, about a painful punishment
except those polytheists with whom you have made a treaty.
.....If one of the polytheists, i.e. one of those whom I have ordered
you to kill, asks your protection, give it him so that he may hear
the word of God; then convey him to his place of safety.
Basically, Muhammad had an agreement with a number of Arab tribes.
Some were peaceful with him, others disliked him. "Allah" gave
Muhammad a "revelation" allowing him to break his word,
the "agreement" with the pagan Arabs and attack them after the four
sacred months were over. Once again, Muhammad had gained power, and
things changed. Now Muhammad was permitted to lie, i.e., break his
agreement, and make war upon the pagans. Muhammad's circumstances
changed - Allah changed again.
Note that in the last quoted paragraph, it is supposed to be God
telling the Muslims to go out and kill people. Some of these people
had gotten along peacefully with the Muslims. But because they didn't
follow Muhammad, they were going to be attacked.
Ch 2 ISLAMIC TERRORISM UPON MUSLIMS WHO LEAVE ISLAM
Muhammad was not content to conquer by force, or kill those that
merely opposed him verbally. Muhammad also taught that Muslims who
leave the Islamic faith are to be murdered as well. Here are some
quotes from Bukhari's collection of Hadith. Remember, Bukhari's
Hadith is the second most important writing in Islam, following the
Quran.
Bukhari, volume 9, #17
"Narrated Abdullah: Allah's Messenger said, "The blood of a Muslim
who confesses that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and
that I am His Messenger, cannot be shed except in three cases: in
Qisas (equality in punishment) for murder, a married person who
commits illegal sexual intercourse and the one who reverts from Islam
(Apostate) and leaves the Muslims."
Bukhari volume 9, #57
Narrated Ikrima, "Some atheists were brought to Ali and he burnt
them. The news of this event, reached Ibn Abbas who said, "If I had
been in his place, I would not have burnt them, as Allah's messenger
forbade it, saying, "Do not punish anybody with Allah's punishment
(fire)." I would have killed them according to the statement of
Allah's Messenger, "Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill
him."
Bukhari volume 9, #64
Narrated Ali, "Whenever I tell you a narration from Allah's
messenger, by Allah, I would rather fall down from the sky, then
ascribe a false statement to him, but if I tell you something between
me and you, (not a Hadith), then it was indeed a trick (i.e., I may
say things just to cheat my enemy). No doubt I heard Allah's
messenger saying, "During the last days there will appear some young
foolish people, who will say the best words, but their faith will not
go beyond their throats (i.e. they will leave the faith) and will go
out from their religion as an arrow goes out of the game. So,
wherever you find them, kill them, for whoever kills them shall have
reward on the Day of Resurrection."
Not only did Muhammad teach that Muslims are to murder those that
have left Islam, "wherever you find them", he further taught that a
Muslim who commits this type of murder will be doing God's service
and be rewarded!
Ch 3 RECENT MUSLIM WRITINGS ON ISLAM AND TERRORISM
Several Muslims have written about the reasons they are allowed to
wage war. From "The Quranic Concept of War", by Pakistani Brigadier
S.K. Malik, it says, [in the preface]
"But in Islam war is waged to establish supremacy of the Lord only
when every other argument has failed to convince those who reject His
Will and work against the every purpose of the creation of mankind."
"Many Western Scholars have pointed their accusing fingers at some of
the above verses in the Quran to be able to contend that world of
Islam is in a state of perpetual struggle against the non-Muslims. As
to them it is a sufficient answer to make... that the defiance of
God's authority by one who is His slaves exposes that slave to the
risk of being held guilty of treason and as such a one, in the
perspective of Islamic law, is indeed to be treated as a sort of that
cancerous growth on that organism of humanity.... It thus becomes
necessary to remove the cancerous malformation even if it be by
surgical means, in order to save the rest of humanity."
The Muslim writer states that those that reject Islam are viewed as a
cancerous growth to be violently removed, i.e., murdered. And, note
that the Muslim writer basically agrees with the "Western Scholars"
that say that Islam is indeed "in a state of perpetual war", with non-
Muslims.
In viewing what has happened in Algeria, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran,
etc. it appears that Islam is the cancerous growth that has caused
such death to the world.
Ch 4 ISLAMIC TERRORISM IN THE WORLD TODAY, websites
There are a fair amount of websites that document the actions and
intentions of the many Islamic terrorist groups operating throughout
the world today. As true Muslims, these people will use violence
against anyone who hinders their aims or offends their religious
beliefs. Here is a partial listing of a number of websites I've seen
on the internet.
https://www.emergency.com/cntrterr.htm
https://www.state.gov/www/global/terrorism/1997report/
https://www.hri.org/docs/USSD-Terror/97/mideast.html
overview of Middle East terrorism
https://www.hri.org/docs/USSD-Terror/
https://www.terrorism.com
https://polisci.home.mindspring.com/ptd.html
https://polisci.home.mindspring.com/ptd_incidents_1998.html
62 documented incidents - 31 by Muslims
https://polisci.home.mindspring.com/ptd_middle_africa.html
listing of Mid-east Muslim terrorist groups
https://www.ict.org.il/
international terrorism group
Ch 5 ISLAMIC TERRORISM IN AMERICA TODAY, FEW SUMMARIES
Here are some summaries of Islamic terrorism in America or against
Americans
#1) Osama bin Laden, one of the Islamic world's leading
terrorists was behind the bombing of the American Embassies in Kenya
and Tanzania. Twelve Americans were killed and there were hundreds
of other deaths due to the bombings. Bin Laden has declared open
season on American civilians, women and children included. He says
Islamic scholars have allowed the targeting of civilians because
their taxes support the American military, therefore, they too are at
war with Bin Laden's Islamic goals.
Bin Laden was interviewed by a Muslim journalist, and the interview
appears in the Jan 11, 1999 issue of Newsweek. Here are some
excerpts:
QUESTION: "Why have you asked Muslims to target civilian Americans
all over the world? Islam prohibits its followers from killing
civilians in war?"
BIN LADEN: "If the Israelis are killing small children in Palestine
and the Americans are killing the innocent people in Iraq, and if the
majority of the American people support their dissolute president,
this means the American people are fighting us and we have the right
to target them.
QUESTION: "All Americans?"
BIN LADEN "Muslim scholars have issued a fatwa [a religious order]
against any American who pays taxes to his government. He is our
target, because he is helping the American war machine against the
Muslim nation.
Below is an excerpt from ABC news.
ABCNEWS.com (on Osama bin Laden - edited for length)
His fatwa was clear: Americans must die, within the next few weeks.
U.S. troops will leave Saudi Arabia when Islamic terrorists "send
the bodies of American troops and civilians home in wooden boxes and
coffins," Osama Bin Ladin vowed in an exclusive interview with ABC
NEWS Correspondent John Miller. "We don't differentiate between those
dressed in military uniforms and civilians. They are all targets in
this fatwa."
Bin Ladin recently convened a meeting of fundamentalist extremists
and sponsors of terrorism. More than 150 clerics named themselves
the "International Islamic Front for the Jihad against Jews and
Crusaders," and issued a variety of fatwas. But Bin Ladin's is the
one that most concerns U.S. security analysts.
Ch 6 Bombing the World Trade Center in New York
On February 26, 1993, Muslim terrorists bombed the World Trade Center
in New York City, killing 6 people and injuring over 1000 more. It
was found that these terrorists were tied in with a Muslim cleric
named Sheik Omar Abd al-Rahman, who was also accused of terrorist
actions in Egypt. Omar preached that the United States is a den of
evil and fornication and regularly called upon Muslims to attack
their enemies.
#3) In June 1993 eight Muslims were arrested by the FBI. There
were reportedly planning bombings targeting the United Nations
headquarters, FBI offices, and the Holland and Lincoln tunnels, as
well as several assassinations.
#4) In Jan. 1993, a Pakistani Muslim shot and killed several
CIA employees outside of the CIA headquarters. He fled to Pakistan.
Later he was apprehended and returned to America for trial. The day
after he was found guilty, Pakistanis in Pakistan murdered four
American businessmen - probably as revenge for our judicial system
finding their comrade guilty.
#5) An arrested Hamas terrorist in Israel told authorities
that Hamas leaders in held a workshop in Chicago where Hamas
inductees were taught how to make car bombs.
#6) Last year, a Muslim who converted to Christianity was
attacked and his home was firebombed by Muslims in Minnesota.
#7) On November 4th, 1979, Muslims in Iran took many American
Embassy employees hostage. There were held for 444 days. Some died
in captivity. They were released around the time Ronald Reagan
became president.
#8) Here is another foiled terrorist attempt in America....
Palestinian Guilty in Subway Plot
NEW YORK (AP) - A Palestinian who said he wanted to kill as many Jews
``as I could take'' was convicted today of plotting to blow up a busy
subway station. Gazi Ibrahim Abu Mezer, who faces life in prison,
jumped to his feet after the verdict was read and shouted ``Allahu
Akbar! (God is great)'' as he held up the Koran, the Muslim holy
book. The federal jury acquitted a second Palestinian, Lafi Khalil,
of plotting the suicide-bombing. Last Monday, testifying against his
lawyers' wishes, Abu Mezer said he had planned to ``martyr'' himself
and kill ``as many (Jews) as I could take.''
#9) In Nov., 1989, a Palestinian Muslim and his wife,
murdered their own 14 daughter. Their daughter had not lived
according to their view of Islam. Finally, the father and mother
assaulted the girl. The mother held the girl down while the father
stabbed her to death. Unknown to this Muslim family, this man was
under investigation by the FBI, and a bug had legally been planted in
the house. The entire murder was called on tape. As the girl
struggled and begged her mother to help her, the father said in
Arabic, "Die, die quickly, die quickly".
This murder is written about in People magazine, 1/20/92.
#10) Even in America's military there are Muslim who are
charged with aiding the terrorists who have murdered American
citizens. The following is from a recent news article:
NEW YORK (Reuters) - A former U.S. Army sergeant was indicted
Wednesday for allegedly participating in a conspiracy led by Saudi
exile Osama bin Laden to kill Americans abroad.
Ali Mohamed, 46, was charged with acting with others including bin
Laden's group al Qaeda to plan the murders of U.S. military personnel
stationed in Saudi Arabia and Somalia and last August's bombings of
the U.S. embassies in Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Bin Laden, a fugitive, was indicted last year for the attacks. The
charges filed Wednesday allege that in September Mohamed lied to a
Manhattan federal grand jury investigating al Qaeda's role in last
year's African bombings. According to information from the U.S. Army
Reserve Personnel Center, Mohamed was in the reserves at the time of
some of the alleged offenses. He joined the
reserves in 1989 after a term of active duty and left the reserves in
1994. Mohamed, a former major in the Egyptian Army, was granted a
visa to enter the United States in 1985 and became an American
citizen. According to U.S. Army Reserve he enlisted in the U.S. Army
in 1986 and was stationed at Fort Bragg, N.C.
The indictment charges that at least as early as 1989, bin Laden and
others made efforts to recruit U.S. citizens including Mohamed to
travel in the Western world to help al Qaeda carry out operations.
It is also charged that as early as 1990 Mohamed provided military
and intelligence training for al Qaeda in Afghanistan, Pakistan and
Sudan. The indictment further alleges that Mohamed, with others,
helped bin Laden in 1991 to move from Peshawar, Pakistan, to Sudan.
The indictment charges that bin Laden, an exiled Saudi multi-
millionaire, issued a fatwa, or religious decree, calling for the
killing of U.S. citizens and financed the embassy bombings and other
attacks on Americans. It is alleged that al Qaeda functioned both on
its own and through other organizations that operated under its
umbrella, including the Al Jihad group based in Egypt and the Islamic
Group that was led by Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman. The sheik was
convicted in 1996 for a plot to bomb New York City landmarks and kill
political and religious figures.
The indictment accuses Mohamed of sending a document about Abdel
Rahman's trial to another defendant in Kenya for delivery to bin
Laden. Court papers do not describe the document, sent from
California in 1995. Another part of the indictment alleges that
Mohamed traveled to Nairobi in 1994 using a fake Egyptian passport.
He then showed his U.S. passport to enter the U.S. embassy there.
The indictment alleges that the same year he met members of al Qaeda
and reviewed files ``concerning possible terrorist attacks'' against
the embassy in Nairobi and other places in Nairobi, including the
building housing the U.S. Agency for International Development and
British, French and Israeli targets. It is further charged that
Mohamed discussed targets in countries other than Kenya. According to
the indictment as of August of last year, Mohamed had documents about
surveillance and explosives and ``the planning of terrorist
operations and the structuring of a terrorist group into different
cells.''
Fortunately, America is not a hotbed of Islamic terrorism. Not yet
anyway. Unfortunately, Muslim terrorists are at work all throughout
the world. Violence is part and parcel with Islam. Here is just a
small sampling of some of the Islamic terrorist actions that have
occurred in the last 15 years.
CH 7 ISLAMIC ACTIONS OF TERRORISM TODAY IN THE WORLD
FRANCE - Several years ago, Muslim terrorist began bombing innocent
French civilians. Here is one article:
TERROR Campaign widens; Bomb in Paris Subway
Chicago, IL., July 25, 1995 --At least four (4)people were killed and
another 35 wounded in an afternoon terror attack that took place
today in the Paris Saint-Michel underground station, near the Latin
quarter. Police officials are investigating and wouldn't immediately
comment, but French Prime Minister Alain Juppe is quoted by the
Reuters News service as saying that he believes that "there is a very
strong suspicion of a (terrorist) attack".
These attacks were similar to bombings carried out by Muslim
terrorists in France in 1986, in which dozens of people were killed.
ALGERIA
Approximately 100,000 people have been killed in Algeria during the
last 7 years or so. Below is one story from one of the survivors of
an Islamic terrorist attack. The Muslim terrorists are not
responsible for all the deaths; the Algerian police and Army have
also killed many. However, the Muslim terrorists frequently target
civilians, children, and those that are unable to defend themselves.
I've read one account where Muslim terrorists stabbed to death 4
French nuns.
Islamic guerrillas hold captive brides hostage to terror
By Martin Regg Cohn Toronto Star Middle East Bureau
BLIDA, Algeria - In the dead of night, in the name of Islam, four
terrorists burst into the
home of 17-year-old Salima Amina Zenagui.
Accusing her of loose morals, the Islamic fundamentalists ordered
Zenagui to cover her auburn hair with a hijab head-scarf. Then they
abducted her at gunpoint to their underground hideout, where the
teenager was forced to marry a terrorist twice her age.
After a religious wedding ceremony, he raped her - with a warning
that any resistance would mean certain death. The bleeding didn't
stop for 15 days. The mental torture, and the physical cruelty,
continued for another five months. During the long nights and
endless days, Zenagui slowly lost her sanity. And the will to live.
Zenagui is one of thousands of young women and teenage girls believed
to have been kidnapped by fundamentalist terrorists during Algeria's
five-year Islamic insurgency. Forced into so-called temporary
marriages that are a religious license to rape, their screams are
soon silenced.
Most of the victims have their throats slit, their bodies dumped in
wells like the one discovered last week in Bentalha, just outside
Algiers. Police were drawn by the stench of death to the 40-metre-
deep well, where they found about 30 badly decomposed corpses of
women and girls believed to have been abducted and raped after a
massacre in the area a month ago.
Known as "zawaj al mutaa", or "marriage of pleasure,'' the
controversial practice is disdained by mainstream Muslims today. It
dates from Islam's early years, when fighters in a holy war helped
themselves to single women during periods of hardship or isolation.
Zenagui believes her captors were fundamentalist terrorists from the
GIA, who rationalize rape as a way of motivating their men to
sacrifice themselves for Islam. Even as they mistreat their captive
women, they worship their God. In their hideout, Zenagui watched
them pray toward Mecca five times a day. They read the Koran, Islam's
holy book, and often played inspirational cassette tapes about the
Prophet Mohammed.
Many of the insurgency's 100,000 victims perished in these killing
fields.
ARGENTINA
In March 1992, Muslim terrorists blew up the Israeli embassy in
Argentina, killing 29 people.
On July 18, 1994 a car bomb blew up the Argentine-Israeli Mutual
Association, killing nearly one hundred people.
ENGLAND
In August, 1994 two car bombs blew up in London, one at
the Israeli Embassy and another at a Jewish charity shop. An Iranian
expatriate by the name of Manoucher Motamer indicated that Iran was
responsible for the bombings.
JAPAN
In July, 1991, a Muslim murdered Hitoshi Igarashi the Japanese man
who translated "The Satan Verses" into Japanese. He was stabbed to
death in Tokyo. A Muslim living in Britain - Abdul Quddus, who is a
senior vice president of Britain's Muslim league, said, "The attacks
are justified because people translating the book are also insulting
the faith."
INDONESIA
The Voice of the Martyrs Magazine writes that, "around 280 churches
have been burned, demolished, stoned, attached and closed since 1991
in Indonesia (Sept 1996 issue). [That number is up to around 500
churches today.] The article continues, "The June 9, 1996 attack in
Surabaya, the second largest city in the country was the worst yet as
10 churches were simultaneously by Muslim mobs." The article further
records that 5,000 Muslims took part in the riots.
Again, these actions are not the work of a few select terrorists.
They are the work of normal Muslims. They know that Islam is
fundamentally violent, and as Muslims they exercised their faith to
attack and destroy Churches. It was their type of Jihad for Allah.
ITALY
A Muslim stabbed, but failed to kill, Ettore Capriolo, the man who
translated "The Satanic Verses" into Italian. The attack occurred in
Milan Italy.
EGYPT
In Sept 1991, in Imbaba, a district of Cairo, hundreds of Muslims
attacked the minority Christians there, burning down a church with a
Pastor's wife inside. Other churches were attacked, and Christians
were beaten. The government had to send in 3000 troops to stop the
Muslims from continuing to attack the Christians.
During the last 8 years in Egypt, hundreds of Coptic Christians have
been murdered by Muslims in Egypt. Even worshippers in church have
been sprayed by Muslims welding automatic weapons.
CAIRO, Egypt (CNN) -- At least 60 people were killed on Monday when
unidentified gunmen opened fire at the world famous temple site of
Luxor in southern Egypt, according to the interior ministry. The
death toll makes it the deadliest attack on tourists in Egypt.
Authorities said tourists from Egypt, Switzerland, Germany and Japan
were among those killed in the attack, which took place about 300
miles (500 km) south of Cairo. State television issued a brief
statement saying "attackers hit a number of foreigners, Egyptians and
policemen who exchanged fire with them," and the statement added that
six attackers were killed in the shoot-out with police.
A spokesman for a travel agency in Luxor was quoted as saying that
the gunmen opened fire indiscriminately on tourists after the
tourists got off a bus and were about to enter a temple in the
morning.
The assailants later left an empty tour bus, which they had
apparently hijacked in an escape attempt, and reportedly fled toward
the desert and nearby mountains. One hijacker was shot to death at
the shooting scene and the other five were killed in a later shoot-
out, according to the interior ministry. The authorities have
canceled all flights in and out of Luxor as a security precaution.
There was no immediate claim of responsibility for the attack, but
Muslim extremists have repeatedly targeted tourist spots in recent
years in an attempt to hurt one of the country's key industries and
destabilize the government.
A L S O :
List of fatal attacks on visitors in Egypt since 1992
Prior to Monday, attacks by Muslim militants had killed 34
international tourists in the past five years. Overall, about 1,100
people have been killed since 1992, when the extremists launched
their campaign aimed at ousting President Hosni Mubarak.
NIGERIA
In Oct. 1991, thousands of Muslims attacked Christian churches,
businesses, and homes in Kano, Nigeria. Kano is in northern Nigeria,
which is predominately Muslim. It was estimated that 300 Christians
were murdered by Muslim mobs. Muslims were upset because Christian
evangelists had been converting Muslims in the region to
Christianity.
PAKISTAN
When the Muslims in Pakistan found a torn up Quran in a mosque,
30,000 Muslims attacked the only majority Christian town (Shanti
Nagar) in Pakistan and destroyed half of it! Churches were burned,
businesses were destroyed, and women and girls were raped. The army
had to come in to stop the Muslims. A worldwide outcry against the
action prompted Pakistan's Prime Minister Sheriff to help re-build
the Christian homes, churches, businesses that were destroyed.
This action was not the work of an organized terrorist group,
rather it was a display of real Islam. There was no Bin Laden
leading this effort, there was no Hamas or Hezbollah orchestrating
the action, it was ordinary Muslims, 30,000 of them, attacking a
Christian village, because they thought that some Christian had torn
up a Quran.
When Muhammad got offended, he murdered.... today, Muslims get
offended, they murder. It is motivated by one and the same evil
satanic spirit - the same dark spirit that appeared to Muhammad which
caused him to attempt suicide - the same malevolent spirit that then
talked him out of killing himself.... it had better plans for him.
The same demonic spirit that had him massacre 800 Jewish men and
adolescent boys, then enslave their women and children. These Jews
had never clashed swords with Muhammad or his men until he attacked
them. It had a thirst for blood, and during Muhammad's last 10
years, the blood flowed.
Not only have Muslims attacked non-Muslims in Pakistan (Hindus have
also been attacked and murdered in Pakistan), but they religious
strife between Sunni and Shia Muslims there has taken the lives of
hundreds during the last few years. Bombings of each other's mosques
and gun fights outside of Mosques have taken place. Even inside of
the Mosques, people have been shot.
There are many more stories to be found; all over the world, Muslim
terrorists, operating for Islam's sake, are attacking, bombing, and
murdering those they feel inhibit their aims. Visit the already
mentioned websites for more details on the actions of Islamic
terrorists worldwide.
One writer, Samuel Huntington, commenting on Islam and the rest of
the world states wrote in "The Clash of Civilizations",
"Violence also occurs between Muslims, on the one hand, and Orthodox
Serbs in the Balkans, Jews in Israel, Hindus in India, Buddhists in
Burma and Catholics in the Philippines. Islam has bloody borders."
The French philosopher Renan said, "Muslims are the first victim of
Islam". This is true. Muslims loosen much of their desire for blood
upon their Muslim brethren... it's the spirit of Islam. Those that
are not Muslim enough are the first to feel the blades of Islam.
However, many non-Muslims are also it's victims. Innocents are
murdered by Muslims, and the Muslims are not slaking their efforts in
developing more sophisticated methods of using terror against those
who are not of their ilk.
Violence is integral to Islam.
CH 8 HOW DO MOST MUSLIMS LIVING IN AMERICA FIT IN?
Most Muslims are not terrorists. Many of them reject the actions of
their Muslim brethren around the world. Unfortunately, since Islam
teaches world domination, these moderate Muslims rarely raise their
voices in protest. If the Israelis bomb Hezbollah camps in Lebanon,
Muslims in New York, Detroit, and Los Angeles will organize a mass
demonstration. But getting Muslims to condemn the terrorist actions
of their brethren, say of those in Sudan, Egypt, Algeria,
Afghanistan, Iraq is like pulling teeth. While the Muslims world
wide continually condemn Israel, few Muslims have ever raised their
voices in protest over Saddam Hussein's genocidal war upon the
Kurds. Why has Bin Laden failed to help the Kurds? Instead, reports
on Bin Laden now show that he is working together with Saddam
Hussein. Israel has never killed that many Muslims, but Muslims
often turn a blind eye to violent acts when it is Muslim on Muslim
violence.
What does the future for Islam in America hold? One thing I am
certain of; it holds terrorism. I've studied Islamic viewpoints on
America. The majority of Muslims today view America as the last
great wall that stops Islam. In their mind, America must be
destroyed or brought down, by any means necessary. This is what
motivated Sheik Rahman to blow up the New York towers. This is what
motivates Muslims throughout America to speak of a day when America
will fall to Islam's power. Make no mistake about it, Muslims have
murdered Americans in America, and will continue to do so. It is not
a question of "if", it is a question of "when again", because "when"
has already started.
Once again I say, not all Muslims in America are terrorists. Many
of them are good people. But the seeds of terrorism are planted deep
within the theology of Islam. This theology, when free to grow and
blossom, shows itself in the actions normal Muslims, in Muslim
countries take when they feel that Islam is challenged. The
previously mentioned mob attack in Pakistan, and the attacks of the
Muslim mobs in Nigeria and Indonesia, are examples of Muslim -
Islamic violence - mob mentality. And as was demonstrated in "Not
Without My Daughter", who knows when a peaceful, liberal or moderate
Muslim will turn to fundamentalism and embrace the violence of Islam?
CH 9 CONCLUSION
Muhammad was a terrorist. Based upon Muhammad's actions and
teachings, Islam justifies terrorism. Today, Muslims use that
justification to attack and murder those who differ from them.
Muslim terrorists follow in Muhammad's footsteps.
CH 10 REFERENCES
1 "The Life of Muhammad", by A. Guillaume, pub. by Oxford
Univ. Press.
2 "Muhammad and the Jews of Medina", by Weinsnick, page
113:
3 Tabari's History, page 97 of volume 7
4 "Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir", (Book of the Major Classes),
by Ibn Sa'd, translated
by S. Moinul Haq, published by the Pakistan Historical Society.
5 "23 Years: A Study of the Prophetic Career of Mohammad",
by Ali Dashti, pub.
by Mazda. Translated by F.R.C. Bagley.
6 "Sunan Abu Dawud", translated by Ahmad Hasan, pub by Al-
Medina Publications.
Het grondgebied der nederlanden is heilig voor elke oernederlander.
Hoeveel recht heb ik dan als (Hindoe)schrijver om dit grondgebied te ontheiligen?
Kritisch Podium Dewanand
https://www.dewanand.nl |
|
|
|
|
dewanand
Netherlands
267 Posts
|
Posted-21 Feb 2004: 13:25:07
|
Wfor131.doc / 010925tu / source=HINDUTWA / Subject: The unknown genocide by muslims in India / 8709W
Subject: The unknown genocide by muslims in India
CONTENTS
Foreword
What is Hindutva?
Holocaust of Hindus During the Muslim Occupation of India
THE TEMPLE OF KHANDOBA AT JEJURI
Deception practiced by some Historians
What Hiuen Tsang had seen in pre-Islamic India
What Really Happened to Hindu Temples
The Physical Evidence - Mutilated Hindu Architecture
What the Muslim Historians have to Say
Islamic Iconoclasm Today
Hindu Monuments of Pre-Islamic Delhi
- The Nalanda University.
India in the Eyes of Pseudo Secular Historians of Our Times
What Really Happened in India during the Muslim Invasions?
The Finesse of pre-Islamic Hindu Art and Architecture
The Devastation caused by Islamic Iconoclasm
Slaughter of the Civilian Hindu Population
The Psychological Damage to the Hindu Mind
Find Our HinduSite?? Search WWW Search hindutwa.com Search sudheerb.tripod.com
Foreword
A brute can suppress a sage with his brawn and control the sage's actions, but even a brute cannot control the wisdom that keeps growing in the sage's mind all through the darkness of brutal tyranny.
The genocide suffered by the Hindu Community at the hands of the Muslim occupying forces in India for a period of 1100 years is as yet formally undocumented. But its memory survives till today in the hearts of many Hindus, who seek not revenge from the Muslims, but want to ensure that no such horrible event occurs any time in the future anywhere on this globe.
The only similar genocide in the recent past was that of the Jewish people at the hands of the perverted Nazis; and of the Africans during the slave trade perpetrated by the Arab Muslim slave traders and later by the European colonialists as also the almost total wiping out of native populations like the Maoris in Australia and the Red Indians, (Aztecs, Incas, etc.) in North and South America. It has been estimated that in all, millions of African men, women and children died throughout the trade and more than 75% of the native Americans were wiped out.
The holocaust of the Hindus was of similar proportions, the only difference was that it started in the year 715 C.E. with the Arab Muslim invasion of Sindh and continued for 1100 years, i.e. for more than a millennium, till the brutal Muslims were effectively overpowered by the Hindu Marathas in 1720 C.E.
Historians have described the Muslim attack on the Hindus as a conflict of Black with White. Since times immemorial India had been invaded by many people from different parts of our globe (in fact, it was the same for all countries). But what contrasted the pre-Muslim invaders from the Muslims was that after their initial clash with Hindu military power, the pre-Muslim invaders merged into the general mainstream and even the memory of their having come as invaders itself disappeared. We do not consider Emperors like Kanishka (a Ku Shan or Kushana), Milinda (an Indo-Greek), Rudradaman (a Shaka or Scythian from pre-Muslim Iran) to be non-Indians. These invaders have merged into today's general Hindu population.
But the Muslims with their barrack like lifestyle and their contempt for everything non-Islamic, have left a wounded civilization in India. The brutal Muslim tyranny has till today left a split in India's national
character, even after the country was vivisected into two parts - to create Pakistan as a state for Indian Muslims. But in spite of the division of this country to create a separate homeland for the Muslims in 1947, many of them preferred to stay back and today account for the recurrent communal riots, the killings of Hindus and Sikhs in Kashmir and the renewed demand for special status and for the Islamization of India. This is today's reality which could become tomorrow's calamity - if we are not on our guard and take preventive action immediately.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What is Hindutva?
The term "Hindutva" is derived from the two terms "Hindu Tattva", which literally mean "Hindu Principles". Now the question is, what are Hindu Principles and what comprises the "Hindutva" Outlook?
To answer this question we would have to begin with the history of the Hindus. The history of the Hindus is the history of a civilization which has developed in its natural state, without interruption, since antiquity. Its age is dated to be between five and nine thousand years. Hence Hindu History is a prototype of how human civilization would have looked, if civilization all across the globe had been allowed to develop in its natural state. This is the relevance for us to study Hindu Civilization, Hindu History and Hindu Culture.
The evolution of Hindu Civilization can be considered to be natural and continuing as there is no last messiah in the Hindu world view. In fact this is what distinguishes Hindu Civilization from the rest. And this is why Hinduism is called a Living Idea, guided by the sum total of human wisdom that is not considered to be embodied in one person, or one book, or one period of human history. Hence the term "Living". Hindutva is the articulation of this idea of continuity of freedom of thought from which emerge the multifarious Hindu Principles.
Two instances of Hindu Principles that symbolize the outcome of freedom of thought are the pronouncements made not today, but four thousand years back by unnamed rishis (Hindu ascetics) that, "This world is one family" (Vasudaiva Kutumbakam) and that "The Universal Reality is the same, but different people can call it by different names" (Ekam Sat Viprah Bahuda Vadanti). In these two proclamations made in ancient Hindu India, we see the seeds of globalism and freedom of thought, four thousand years before the world was to become the global village of today.
Thus in its true essence, Hindutva is a stridently assertive rational-humanist line of reasoning. And it is this essence of Hindutva that we have kept in mind, while developing this website. At the level of practice, the Hindutva outlook boils down to upholding righteousness (Sat-guna) and fighting ignoble attitudes (Dur-guna). Taking poetic license, we can describe the practitioners of this outlook as "Heenam Naashaayati iti Hinduhu" (Those who uphold righteousness and fight ignobleness are Hindus).
Thus, far from being a narrow nationalistic doctrine, Hindutva is in its true essence, 'a timeless and universal compilation of human wisdom'. Hence it is also called "Sanatana" which means, something that is "forever continuing."
At this site, you will read about different aspects of the history and culture of the Hindus in that part of our globe which is the birthplace of Hindutva. This land is known variously as Bharatvarsha, Hindustan or India. My approach of looking at history is that of a rationalist and humanist. In the context of India, these two values are a result of the freedom of thought which forms the core of the tradition of Hindutva. As my aim is to spread awareness about history and culture, you may freely download this non-profit educational page, print it, link it up from your site, or mirror it at any server.
Incidentally, this site brings you material from eleven books written by the author, over a period of 20 years, since 1980. Each book is presented here as a chapter. The contents of this site are spread over 61 webpages, which translate to about 1500 A4 size printed book pages. The site is richly illustrated with 400+ graphics. Enjoy the infotainment laid out for you at this site.
I also look forward to your valuable suggestions and feedback. Happy viewing.
- Sudheer Birodkar
_________________________________
"The massacres perpetuated by Muslims in India are unparalleled in history, bigger than the Holocaust of the Jews by the Nazis; or the massacre of the Armenians by the Turks; more extensive even than the slaughter of the South American native populations by the invading Spanish and Portuguese."
- Francois Gautier
__________________________________
Hindu History
Holocaust of Hindus During the Muslim Occupation of India
Table of Contents
________________________________________________
Search WWW Search hindutwa.com Search sudheerb.tripod.com
_______________________________________________
This page is dedicated to the memory of those men, women and children who were killed or were captured or converted by force to Islam over a period of eleven centuries in India and for fourteen centuries in other parts of the globe. These men, women and children cannot be recalled for standing witness to what was done to them by the swordsmen of Islam.
Hence we are going to rely on Muslim historians, in India and abroad, who have written hundreds of glowing accounts of the devastation caused by the progress of Islamic armies across the world (and in India). As our focus is India, we are going to look only at what happened in India during the Islamic invasion and the following struggle for independence from Islamic rule that was waged by the Hindus. A pronounced feature of these Muslim histories is a description - in smaller or greater detail but always with considerable pride - of how the Hindus were slaughtered en masse or converted by force, how hundreds of thousands of Hindu men and women and children were captured as booty and sold into slavery, how Hindu temples and monasteries were razed to the ground or burnt down, and how images of Hindu Gods and Goddesses were destroyed or desecrated.
Hampi the capital of Vijaynagar the last Hindu kingdom of the South was ruthlessly pillaged for six months and was nearly reduced to rubble in the year 1565, when the allied Muslim Bahamani armies overran Vijaynagar after the battle of Talikota.
Commandments of Allah (Quran) and precedents set by the Prophet (Sunnah) are frequently cited by the authors in support of what the swordsmen and demolition squads of Islam did with extraordinary zeal, not only in the midst of war but also, and more thoroughly, after Islamic rule had been firmly established.
Almost all medieval Muslim historians credit their heroes with desecration of Hindu idols and/or destruction of Hindu temples. The picture that emerges has the following components, depending upon whether the iconoclast was in a hurry on account of Hindu resistance or did his work at leisure after a decisive victory:
1. The idols were mutilated or smashed or burnt or melted down if they were made of precious metals;
2. Sculptures in relief on walls and pillars were disfigured or scraped away or torn down;
3. Idols of stone and inferior metals or their pieces were taken away, sometimes by cartloads, to be thrown down before the main mosque in
(a) the metropolis of the ruling Muslim sultan and
(b) The holy cities of Islam, particularly Mecca, Medina and Baghdad;
4. There were instances of idols being turned into lavatory seats or handed over to butchers to be used as weights while selling meat;
5. Brahmin priests and other holy men in and around the temple were molested or murdered;
6. Sacred vessels and scriptures used in worship were defiled and scattered or burnt:
7. Temples were damaged or despoiled or demolished or burnt down or converted into mosques with some structural alterations or entire mosques were raised on the same sites mostly with temple materials;
8. Cows were slaughtered on the temple sites so that Hindus could not use them again.
This essay is to enable us to remember the sacrifice of those who attained Veergati (Martyrdom) when faced against these forces of darkness that represented religious bigotry that traumatized and tormented India for Eleven Hundred years and other parts of our globe for Fourteen Hundred years. India has survived as a wounded civilization to tell the story of this chilling horror. A horror that seems too cruel to be true. The unfortunate part is that it was true and this would become true once more in the future, if the forces of malevolence again get the upper hand in India or in any part of the world.
This essay has been compiled from the writings of a cross section of Historians comprising Sir Jadunath Sarkar , Rizwan Salim, Sita Ram Goel, Ram Swarup, Arun Shourie, R.C. Mazumdar and a few others.
An image of Surya in the Konark Temple in Orissawith its arms knocked offThere are innumerable such desecrated images
Epigraphic Evidence of the Construction of Masjids by destroying Hindu temples
There are many mosques all over India which are known to local tradition and the Archaeological Survey of India as built on the site of and, quite frequently, from the materials of, demolished Hindu temples. Most of them carry inscriptions invoking Allah and the Prophet, quoting the Quran and giving details of when, how and by whom they were constructed. The inscriptions have been deciphered and connected to their historical context by learned Muslim calligraphers. They have been published by the Archaeological Survey of India in its Epigraphica Indica Arabic and Persian Supplement.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following few inscriptions have been selected in order to show that:
(1) destruction of Hindu temples continued throughout the period of Muslim domination;
(2) it covered all parts of India - east, west, north, and south; and
(3) all Muslim dynasties, imperial and provincial, participated in the "pious performance".
1. Qu'wat al-Islam Masjid, Qutub Minar, Delhi:
"This fort was conquered and the Jami Masjid built in the year 587 A.H (Hejira Era) by the Amir Qutub-ud-din Aibak the slave of the Sultan, Shahabuddin Ghori. According to the Epigraphica Indica Arabic and Persian Supplement (1909-10, pp.3-4): "The materials of 27 idol temples, on each of which 2,000,000 Delhiwals had been spent were used in the (construction of) the mosque..." The year 587 H. corresponds to 1192 A.D. "Delhiwal was a high-denomination coin current at that time in Delhi.
2. Masjid at Manvi in the Raichur District of Karnataka by Firuz Shah
Bahmani:
"Praise be to Allah that by the decree of the Parvardigar, a mosque has been converted out of a temple as a Sign of religion in the reign of...the Sultan who is the asylum of Faith Firuz Shah Bahmani who is the cause of exuberant spring in the garden of religion" (1962, pp.56-57). The inscription mentions the year 1406-07 A.D. as the time of construction.
3. Jami Masjid at Malan, Palanpur Taluka, Banaskantha District of Gujarat by Khan-i-Azam Ulugh Khan:
"The Jami Masjid was built by Khan-i-Azam Ulugh Khan...who suppressed the wretched infidels. He eradicated the idolatrous houses and mine of infidelity, along with the idols...with the edge of the sword, and made ready this edifice... he made its walls and doors out of the idols; the back of every stone became the place for prostration of the believer" (1963, pp.26-29). The date of construction is mentioned as 1462 A.D. in the reign of Mahmud Shah I (Begada) of Gujarat.
4. Hammam Darwaza Masjid at Jaunpur in Uttar Pradesh in the reign of Akbar, the Great Mughal:
"Thanks that by the guidance of the everlasting and living (Allah), this house of infidelity became the niche of prayer. As a reward for that, the Generous Lord constructed an abode for the builder in paradise" (1969, P 375). Its chronogram yields the year 1567 A.D. in the reign Akbar, the Great Mughal.
A local historian, Fasih-ud-Din, tells us that the temple had been built earlier by Diwan Chaman Das, an official of the Mughal Government.
5. Jami Masjid at Ghoda in the Poona District of Maharashtra by Mir Muhammad Zaman:
"O Allah! O Muhammad! O Ali! When Mir Muhammad Zaman made up his mind, he opened the door of prosperity on himself by his own hand. He demolished thirty three idol temples (and) by divine grace laid the foundation of a building in this abode of perdition" (1933-34, p.24). The inscription is dated 1586 A.D. when the Poona region was ruled by the Nizam Shahi sultans of Ahmadnagar.
6. Gachinala Masjid at Cumbum in the Kurnool District of Andhra Pradesh by Muhammad Shah:
"He is Allah, may he be glorified...During the august rule of...Muhammad Shah, there was a well-established idol-house in uhmum...Muhammad Salih who prospers in the rectitude of the affairs of the Faith...razed to the ground, the edifice of the idol-house and broke the idols in a manly fashion. He constructed on its site a suitable mosque, towering above the buildings of all" (1959-60, pp.64-66). The date of construction is mentioned as 1729-30 A.D. in the reign of the Mughal Emperor Muhammad Shah.
Though sites of demolished Hindu temples were mostly used for building mosques and Idgahs; temple materials were often used in other Muslim monuments as well. Archaeologists have discovered such materials, architectural as well as sculptural, in quite a few forts, palaces, maqbaras, Sufi khanqahs, madrasas, etc.
In Srinagar, Kashmir, temple materials can be seen in long stretches of the stone embankments on both sides of the Jhelum.
The inscriptions on the walls of the Gopi Talav, a stepped well at Surat, tell us that the well was constructed by Haidar Quli, the Mughal governor of Gujarat, in 1718 A.D. in the reign of Farrukh Siyar. One of them says that its bricks were taken from an idol temple". The other informs us that Hiaider Quli Khan, during whose period tyranny has become extinct, laid waste several idol temples in order to make this strong building firm...'' (1933-34. pp.37-44).
THE TEMPLE OF KHANDOBA AT JEJURI
This was one of the many temples that had been destroyed and converted into a Mosque by the Muslim aggressors.
Shivaji Maharaj reconverted it into a temple. Even today, the temple structure displays a mix of Hindu and Muslim architecture. But in spite of the trying circumstances of religious bigotry of the Muslim aggressors in which he operated, Shivaji Maharaj never disrespected the Muslim faith. Whenever a copy of the holy Koran fell into the hands of Maratha troops, Shivaji Maharaj had given strict instructions to treat it with utmost respect and hand it over to the local Maulavis (Muslim priests).
Literary Evidence
Literary evidence of Islamic iconoclasm vis-a-vis Hindu places of worship is far more extensive. It covers a 1onger span of time, from the fifth decade of the 7th century to the closing years of the eighteenth. It also embraces a larger space, from Transoxiana in the north to Tamil Nadu in the south, and from Afghanistan the west to Assam in the east.
Deception practiced by some Historians
Pseudo-secularist "historians" and Muslim apologists would have us believe that medieval Muslim annalists were indulging in poetic exaggerations in order to please their pious patrons. But archaeological explorations in modern times have, however, provided physical proofs of literary descriptions.
The vast cradle of Hindu culture is literally littered with ruins of temples and monasteries belonging to all sects of Sanatana Dharma- Buddhist, Jain, Saiva, Sakta, Vaishnava and the rest.
The literary sources, like the epigraphic, provide evidence of the elation which Muslims felt while witnessing or narrating these "pious deeds". A few citations from Amir Khusro will illustrate the point. The instances cited relate to the doings of Jalalud-Din Firuz Khilji, Alaud-Din Khilji and the latter's military commanders. Khusro served as a court-poet of six successive sultans at Delhi and wrote a masnavi in praise of each after he had murdered his predecessor. Khusro was the dearest disciple of Shaikh Nizamud-Din Awliya and has come to be honoured as a great sufi himself.
In our own times, Khusro is being hailed as the father of a composite Hindu-Muslim culture and the pioneer of secularism. Dr. R.C. Majumdar, whom the Pseudo-secularists malign as a "communalist historian" names him as a "liberal Muslim'.
Here is what Amir Khusro has written:
1. Jhain: "Next morning he (Jalal-ud-din went again to the temples and ordered their destruction ... While the soldiers sought every opportunity of plundering, the Shah was engaged in burning the temples and destroying the idols. There were two bronze idols of Brahma, each of which weighed more than a thousand mans (a measure of weight). These were broken into pieces and the fragments were distributed among the officers with orders to throw them down at the gates of the Masjid on their return (to Delhi)" (Miftab-ul-Futub)
2. Devagiri: "He (Ala-ud-Din) destroyed the temples of the idolaters and erected pulpits and arches for mosques" (ibid).
3. Somanath: "They made the temple prostrate itself towards the Kaaba. You may say that the temple first offered its prayers and then had a bath (i.e. the temple was made to topple and fall into the sea)...He (Ulugh Khan) destroyed all the idols and temples, but sent one idol, the biggest of all idols, to the court of his Godlike Majesty and on that account in that ancient stronghold of idolatry, the summons to prayers (Azzan)was proclaimed so loudly that they heard it in Misr (Egypt) and Madain (Iraq)" (Tarikh-i-Alai).
4. Delhi: "He (Ala-ud-Din) ordered the circumference of the new minar to be made double of the old one (Qutub Minar)... The stones were dug out from the hills and the temples of the infidels were demolished to furnish a supply" (Ibid).
5. Ranthambhor: "This strong fort was taken by the slaughter of the stinking Rai. Jhain was also captured, an iron fort, an ancient abode of idolatry, and a new city of the people of the (muslim) faith arose. The temple of Bahir (Bhairava) Deo and temples of other gods, were all razed to the ground'' (lbid).
6. Brahmastpuri (Chidambaram): "Here he (Malik Kafur) heard that in Brahmastpuri there was a golden idol ... he then determined on razing the temple to the ground ..lt was the holy place of the Hindus which Malik dug up from its foundations with the greatest care. And the heads of Brahmans and idolaters danced from their necks and fell to the ground at their feet, and blood flowed in torrents.
The stone idols called Ling Mahadeo which had been established a long time at the place and on which the women of the infidels (Hindus) rubbed their vaginas for (sexual) satisfaction. (Mark the extent of the derogatory tone of the Islamic Saint Amir Khusro - Author). These, up to this time, the kick of the horse of Islam had not attempted to break. The Musalmans destroyed all the lingas, and Deo Narain fell down.
The Kutub Minar built by Kutub-ud-din Aibak. The Kutub Minar is one of the earliest Islamic monuments in India. This Minar was built from the columns of destroyed Hindu and Jain temples. It stands at the site of Pithoragarh which was the capital of Prithiviraj Chauhan, the last Hindu ruler of Delhi.The damaged motifs in this picture show clear Hindu origins - a testimony to the vandalism of the Muslim aggressors. There are many such temples which had been converted into mosques like the Bhoja Shala Mosque, the Gyan Vyapi Mosque, the Krishna Janmabhoomi Idgah, apart from the now liberated Ramjanmabhoomi at Ayodhya. The total runs to 3000 (Three Thousand).
In the opinion of the author, all such controversial structures should be taken possession of by a national educational trust and be converted into schools for humanist and rationalist education. This could be the first step in the long journey for converting all places of religious worship all over the globe into schools for humanist and rationalist education where humans can finally be taught the futility of worshipping human ignorance termed as God and the stupidity of fighting each other due to the different names we have given to human ignorance.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What Hiuen Tsang had seen in pre-Islamic India
Some historians say that the Hindu temples in North India had been destroyed not by the Muslim invaders but by the White Huns who had invaded India in the 5th century, i.e. 500 years before the first Muslims set their foot in north India in the 10th century.
Hiuen Tsang, a Buddhist pilgrim, who came from China, after the invasion of the White Huns, found many monasteries in pre-Islamic India. He said they were in a splendid state. In his days the White Huns had invaded north India and had even established their rule over Kashmir where Hiuen Tsang saw 500 monasteries housing 5,000 monks It is, therefore, difficult to hold them responsible for the disappearance of Buddhist centres in areas where Hiuen Tsang had found them flourishing.
An explanation has to be found elsewhere. In any case, the upheaval the White Huns caused was over by the middle of the sixth century. Moreover, the temples and monasteries which Hiuen Tsang saw were only a few out of many. He had not gone into the interior of any province, having confined himself to the more famous Buddhist centres.
What Really Happened to Hindu Temples
So what was it that really happened to thousands upon thousands of temples and monasteries? Why did they disappear and/or give place to another type of monuments? How come that their architectural and sculptural fragments got built into the foundations, doors, walls and domes of the Islamic edifices which replaced them? These are crucial questions which should have been asked by students of medieval Indian history.
But no historian worth his name has raised these questions squarely, not to speak of finding accurate answers to them. No systematic study of the subject has been made. What we have is stray references to the demolition of a few Hindu temples, made by the more daring Hindu historians while discussing the religious policies of this or that sultan.
Sir Jadunath Sarkar and Professor Sri Ram Sharma have given more attention to the Islamic policy of demolishing Hindu temples and pointed an accusing finger at the theological tenets which dictated that policy. But their treatment of the subject is brief and their enumeration of temples destroyed by Aurangzeb and the other Mughal emperors touches only the fringe of a vast holocaust caused by the Theology of Islam all over the cradle of Hindu Culture and throughout more than thirteen hundred years of Muslim occupation of India.
What the Muslim Historians have to Say
Muslim historians, in India and abroad, have written hundreds of accounts in which the progress of Islamic armies across the cradle of Hindu culture is narrated, stage by stage and period by period.
A pronounced feature of these Muslim histories is a description - in smaller or greater detail but always with considerable pride - of how the Hindus were slaughtered en masse or converted by force, how hundreds of thousands of Hindu men and women and children were captured as booty and sold into slavery, how Hindu temples and monasteries were razed to the ground or burnt down, and how images of Hindu Gods and Goddesses were destroyed or desecrated.
Islamic Iconoclasm Today
A gigantic image of the Great Master - Buddhaat Bamiyan near Kabul in Afghanistan.It is this image which has been threatened to be blown up by the Taliban,the Islamic militia that rules Afghanistan.The statue faced its first defilement at the hands of Islamic invaderswhen they invaded pre-dominantly Buddhist Afghanistan in the 8th centuryIncidentally the name Afghanistan is derived from the Sanskrit terms Upa-gana-stanwhich means "Lands where the Allied tribes live".
Commandments of Allah (Quran) and precedents set by the Prophet (Sunnah) are frequently cited by the authors in support of what the swordsmen and demolition squads of Islam did with extraordinary zeal, not only in the midst of war but also, and more thoroughly, after Islamic rule had been firmly established.
Islamic Theology supports the Destruction of ALL Non-Muslim Places of Worship
A reference to the Quran and to the Theology of Islam as perfected by the orthodox Imams, leaves little doubt about the violent and aggressive nature of Islam.
Jihad is Allah's command to the Muslims to destroy the non- Muslims. It is not at all necessary that the non-Muslims need have wronged the Muslims, for them to be attacked by the Muslims. The "crime" that the non-Muslims do not believe in Islam is enough for the Muslims to attack the non-Muslims. Here is what the Quran says:
"I have been commanded by Allah to fight the unbelievers until they believe in Allah and His prophet and follow the laws of Islam. It is only then that the safety of their lives and property may be guaranteed." (Sahih Tirmzi, Vol. 2: 192)
And why should they persecute and annihilate the non-Muslims? The Koran explains the point:
"God has bought from the believers their selves and their possessions against the gift of paradise; they fight in the way of God; they kill, and are killed; that is a promise; binding on God.... And who fulfills his covenant truer than God? So rejoice in the bargain you have made ith Him that is the mighty triumph..." (Repentance: 192)
Jihad, as can be seen, is a covenant between Allah and the Muslims; the former offers paradise to the latter for killing and plundering the non-Muslims without having any moral qualm in return for Paradise. Obviously, according to Islamic theology the massacre of the fellow-beings and the plunder of their possession is an act of great righteousness because it attracts the highest reward - that is, paradise. The Quran justifies booty, the plunder of the infidels in the following words:
"It is not for any prophet to have prisoners, until he make wide slaughter in land.....
Eat of what you have taken as booty, it is lawful and good." (The Spoils: 65)
Here is the essence of Islamic Jihad: Invade the non-Muslims in the name of Allah for the sheer crime of not believing in Him; first carry out an extensive carnage of the people then all their property including women and children become legally and morally the possessions of the Muslims, who are at liberty to use them as they think fit.
The Physical Evidence - Mutilated Hindu Architecture
The apologists for Islam - the most clogged among them are some Pseudo-secularist historians and politicians - have easily got away with the plea that Muslim court scribes having succumbed to poetic exaggeration in order to please their pious patrons. Their case is weakened when they cite the same sources in support of their speculations or when the question is asked as to why the patron needed stories of bloodshed and wanton destruction for feeding their piety.
There are, however witnesses who are not beyond recall who can confirm that the Muslim court scribes were not at all foisting fables on their readers. These are the hundreds of thousands of sculptural and architectural fragments which stand arrayed in museums and drawing rooms all over the world, or which are awaiting to be picked up by public and private collectors, or which stare at us from numerous Muslim monuments.
These are the thousands of Hindu temples and monasteries which either stand on the surface in a state of ruination or lie buried under the earth waiting for being brought to light by the archaeologist's spade. These are the thousands of Muslim edifices, religious as well as secular, which occupy the sites of Hindu temples and monasteries and/or which have been constructed from materials of those monuments. All these witnesses carry unimpeachable evidence of the violence that was done to them, deliberately and by malevolent hands.
The Silence of Art Historians regarding the mutilation of Hindu Art, Architecture and Sculpture
So far no one has cared to make these witnesses speak and relate the story of how they got ruined, demolished, dislocated, dismembered, defaced mutilated and burnt. Recent writers on Hindu architecture and sculpture - their tribe is multiplying fast, mostly for commercial reasons - ignore the ghastly wounds which these witnesses show at the very first sight, and dwell on the beauties of the limbs that have survived or escaped injury.
Many a time they have to resort to their imagination for supplying what should have been there but is missing. All they seem to care for is building their own reputations as historians of Hindu art. If one draws their attention to the mutilations and disfigurements suffered by the subjects under study, one is met with a stunned silence or denounced downright as a Hindu chauvinist out to raise 'demons from the past with the deliberate intention of causing communal strife. I, therefore, propose to present only one case out the innumerable of these in order to show in what shape such monuments are and what tale of vandalism they have to tell.
Hindu Monuments of Pre-Islamic Delhi
Archaeological excavations during 1992-95 at Lalkot, a Tomar citadel near Mehrauli before Delhi was occupied by Muhammad Ghori in 1192, have uncovered the following:
- Antiquities in the levels of Period II (Early Sultanate). A number of sculptural and architectural fragments in stone of the Rajput period have been noticed scattered on the surface or found in the levels of Period II, either in the deposits or reused in construction of early Sultanate structures.
They included a Varaha head; amalakas; adhisthana mouldings; pillar bases; parts of sculptured door jambs, one with maithuna figures; moulded and decorated architectural fragments; small sculptures showing Tirthankara, deities, vase etc.; Nandi figure and a lion's head which can be connected with the story of stone lion figures at the gate of the palaces of Anang Pal II.
The evidence of stone Nandi suggests for the first time the existence of a Shiva temple in the vicinity. The pre-Muslim association of this structural period of early Sultanate age is evidenced by a number of scattered or reused architectural and sculptural stone fragments. Among them the hind part of a figure of Nandi, the Vahana of Lord Shiva, reused in the foundation of wall as a rubble.
- The Nalanda University.
The defeat of the last Hindu Kings of North India - Prithviraj Chauhan and Jaichandra Gahadawal (Rathore) in 1192 and 1194 C.E., respectively by the Afghan raider, Mahmud Shahabuddin Ghori (Ghauri) opened up the Gangetic plains to the ruthless invader where the Buddhist (and Hindu) centres of learning were located. The destruction of monasteries and the slaughter of monks that followed the headlong rush, of the Muslim invaders down the Ganges, stilled the agony of this once glorious; educational and monastic institution into the silence of death.
Before it was destroyed by the blind fury of the Muslim invaders, the Nalanda University housed nine million manuscripts. It was the center of education for scholars from all over Asia and Europe. Many Greek, Persian and Chinese students studied here.
Its vivid descriptions in the chronicles of Huien Tsang, the Chinese Buddhist scholar who visited Nalanda twelve hundred years ago... bring the crumbling stones back to life again. It was this university that was the cradle of ancient Hindu mathematics, astronomy, linguistics, philosophy and theology.
Nothing remains today of this great ancient university.... except ruins! The fanatical ferocity of the Muslim invaders made sure of that. The blazing fires into which the Muslims soldiers threw the nine million manuscripts, reduced them to ashes. Yet this vandalism and hatred of the marauders could not destroy the immortal wisdom that lay within. The spirit that went behind the creation of this university could never be destroyed permanently.
The memory of that intellectual tradition, that was sought to be estroyed by the Muslim Marauders, survives in the hearts of many Indians. The living proof of this is the creation of this website that tries to recollect the immortal wisdom of ancient India. A wisdom that has never preached malice against other faiths, nor have the citizens of this country ever indulged in a holy war against those of another country. Indians have since ancient times won their way by persuasion and never by the sword, nor have they ever used their position or power to compel conformity to their precepts.
Only in ancient India did we have an emperor (Samrat Ashok Maurya) who after a military victory - laid down his weapons and forswore violence. There is no parallel to this attitude, the world over. It is due to this deep sagacity that we could preserve our innate spirit of humanness in face of the heart-rending tyranny of the Muslims - which we had to live with, for eleven centuries at a stretch. And yet we still survive as a wounded civilization to tell the tale of the kind of culture we had before we were forced to shed our blood against the sword of the Islamic Jihad.
India in the Eyes of Pseudo Secular Historians of Our Times
Their interpretation of Indian history recognizes only the economic reality. And although economic reality is an important element of human existence. It is not the only one. Issues like Religious Fanaticism, exist independent of economic factors. These Historians view the Muslim invasions of India purely as raids of bandits out who came to loot the material wealth of India. To loot the temples of Somnath, Thanesar, Mathura, Kanauj, etc. Yes the Muslim invaders did loot the country's material wealth. But they also destroyed the Nalanda University, and burned down the countless treatises that were stored there. The Muslim invaders converted millions of Hindus to Islam at the point of the Sword, they also massacred millions more and had a practice of making a tower of severed enemy (Hindu) heads in the main square of a town after its conquest. They abducted many Hindu women and held them as concubines in Harems.
____________________________________________________
(You have completed viewing half of this page. If you would like to have a sneak preview into the next page, before you continue viewing the rest of this page, you may roll your mouse over the frame below to see the pictures on the next page which talks about the Holocaust of Hindus during the Muslim Occupation of India for 1100 years.)
The script for the above applet has been written by Chintamani Thakur.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list of crimes against humanity on part of the medieval Muslim invaders could be endless. Now these crimes do not have any economic angle at all. But all the same they were committed and they reflect in clear terms a barbaric and backward attitude. About this there is no doubt. The Pseudo Secular Historians try to mask this reality. And in this they are guilt of hiding facts and distorting history. They write that Mahmud Ghaznavi only destroyed temples to plunder their wealth, not for religious motives: a theory in flagrant contradiction with all the contemporary evidence. Mahmud was a devout Muslim, who copied the Quran "for the benefit of his soul". He refused the huge ransom which the Hindus offered in return for an idol which he had captured, since he preferred to be an idol breaker rather than an idol-seller". He destroyed many non-wealthy Hindu temples and left wealthy mosques untouched. He wasted time in non-profit acts of desecration, like hanging a cow's tongue around an idol's neck. On such facts, no honest historian would have built the conclusion that Mahmud was led by economical rather that fanatical religious motives.
What Really Happened in India during the Muslim Invasions?
Invaders at a very low level of civilisation and culture worth the name, from Arabia and west Asia, began entering India from the early eighth century onwards. Islamic invaders demolished countless Hindu temples, shattered uncountable sculptures and idols, plundered innumerable palaces and forts of Hindu kings, killed vast numbers of Hindu men and carried off Hindu women. This story, the educated Indians - and a lot of even the illiterate Indians - know very well. Indian History books at School and College do not tell the story in its true detail. Hence many Indians do not seem to recognize that the alien Muslim marauders destroyed the historical evolution of what was a spiritually, philosophically and materially advanced civilisation.
Pre-Islamic Hindu civilization was the most richly imaginative culture, and the most vigorously creative society.
The damaged armless image of the bodyguard of Shiva-Maheshwara as depicted at the Hoysaleshwara Temple complex at Halebid.
Hindu temples built in the ancient times were perfect works of art. The evidence of theferocity with which the Muslim invaders must have struck at the sculpturesof gods and goddesses, and apsaras, kings and queens, dancers and musicians isfrightful. At so many ancient temples of Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh, forexample, shattered portions of stone images still lie scattered in the temple
courtyards.
Considering the fury used on the idols and sculptures, the stone-breaking axe must have been applied to thousands upon thousands of images of hypnotic beauty. Giving proof of the resentment that men belonging to an inferior civilisation feel upon encountering a superior civilisation of individuals with a more refined culture.
It is clear that India at the time when Muslim invaders turned towards it (8th to 11th century) was a rich region for its religion and culture: and its fine arts and letters and even for its wealth in terms of material sciences, art and architecture, precious and semi-precious stones, gold and silver.
Tenth century India was also too far advanced than its contemporaries in the East and the West for its achievements in the realms of speculative philosophy and scientific theorizing, mathematics and knowledge of nature's workings. Hindus of the early medieval period were unquestionably superior in more things than the Chinese, the Persians (including the Sassanians), the Romans and the Byzantines of the immediate preceding centuries.
The Finesse of pre-Islamic Hindu Art and Architecture
Medieval India until the Islamic invaders destroyed it, was history's most richly imaginative culture and one of the world's most advanced civilisations of those times. Look at the Hindu art that Muslim iconoclasts severely damaged or destroyed. Ancient Hindu sculpture is vigorous and sensual in the highest degree-more fascinating than any other figural art created anywhere else on earth. (Only statues created by classical Greek artists are in the same class as Hindu temple sculpture.)
Ancient Hindu temple architecture is the most awe-inspiring, ornate and spell-binding architectural style. (The Gothic art of cathedrals in Western Europe is the only other religious architecture that is comparable with the intricate architecture of ancient Hindu temples such as those at Khajuraho, Madurai, Dwarka, Kanchipuram,etc.) No artists of any historical civilisation have ever revealed the same genius as ancient India's artists and artisans.
The Devastation caused by Islamic Iconoclasm
Their minds filled with venom against the idol-worship and the idol-worshippers of India, the Muslims destroyed any Hindu temple that came their way. This is a historical fact, mentioned by Muslim chroniclers and others of the time. When the Muslims faced Hindu resistance and were forced to retreat they merely damaged the Hindu temples they could lay their hands on but the temples remained standing. This is what happened in South India.
But a large number - not hundreds but many thousands - of the ancient Hindu temples in North India were broken into shards of cracked stone. In the ancient cities of Varanasi and Mathura, Ujjain and Maheshwar, Jwalamukhi and Dwaraka, not one temple survives whole and intact from the ancient times. The wrecking of Hindu temples went on from the early years of the 8th century to well past 1700 AD, a period of almost 1000 years. Every Muslim ruler in Delhi (or Governor of Provinces) spent most of his time warring against Hindu kings in the north and the south, the east and the west: and almost every Muslim Sultan and his army commanders indulged in large-scale destructions of Hindu temples and idols.
It is easy to conclude that virtually every Hindu temple built in the ancient times is a perfect work of art. The evidence of the ferocity with which the Muslim invaders must have struck at the sculptures of gods and goddesses, and apsaras, kings and queens, dancers and musicians is frightful. At so many ancient temples of Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh, for example, shattered portions of stone images still lie scattered in the temple courtyards.
Considering the fury used on the idols and sculptures, the stone-breaking axe must have been applied to thousands upon thousands of images of hypnotic beauty. Giving proof of the resentment that men belonging to an inferior civilisation feel upon encountering a superior civilisation of individuals with a more refined culture,
Islamic invaders from Arabia and western Asia broke and burned everything beautiful they came across in India. So morally degenerate were the Muslim Sultans that, rather than attract Hindu "infidels" to Islam through force of personal example and exhortation, they just built a number of mosques at the sites of torn down temples - and foolishly pretended that they had triumphed over the minds and culture of the Hindus. I have seen stones and columns of Hindu temples incorporated into the architecture of several mosque, including the Jama Masjid and Ahmed Shah Masjid in Ahmedabad; the mosque in the Uparkot fort of Junagadh (Gujarat) and in Vidisha (near Bhopal); the Adhai Din Ka Jhonpra right next to the famous dargah in Ajmer-and the currently controversial Bhojshala "mosque" in Dhar (near Indore).
Hindu culture was at its imaginative best and vigorously creative when the severely-allergic-to-images Muslims entered India. Islamic invaders did not just destroy countless temples and constructions but also suppressed cultural and religious practices; damaged the pristine vigour of Hindu culture; prevented the intensification of Hindu culture, debilitating it permanently; stopped the development of Hindu arts: ended the creative impulse in all realms of thought and action; damaged the people's cultural pride, disrupted the transmission of values and wisdom, cultural practices and tradition from one generation to the next; destroyed the proper historical evolution of Hindu kingdoms and society; affected the acquisition of knowledge, research and reflection and violated the moral basis of Hindu
society.
Slaughter of the Civilian Hindu Population
The Muslim Swordsmen also slaughtered a lot of Hindus civilians away from the battlefield. This was something that the Hindus were not used to. Although pre-Islamic India was not exactly a zone of peace, and there used to be warfare, but there was also a code of warfare too.
War took place from Sunrise up to Sunset
Warfare under the shadow of darkness was considered foul
In the battlefield, an adversary who laid down his arms was not to be slaughtered.
No civilian population was ever killed.
This code of warfare was followed by the Hindus right up to the Muslim invasions, and this was one reason for the successive Hindu defeats at the hands of the Muslims who had no qualms for foul means during warfare and even in peace times.
Needless to add that the Muslim invaders converted millions of Hindus to Islam at the point of the Sword, they also massacred millions more and had a practice of making a tower of severed enemy (Hindu) heads in the main square of a town after its conquest. They abducted many Hindu women and held them as concubines in Harems.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Most Muslim rulers were fanatical proselytizers of their religion. Under the rulership of Delhi Sultans the public worship at Hindu temples was generally forbidden, Hindus were not allowed to build new temples or repair old ones. Some rulers like Allah-ud-din Khilji and Feroz Shah Tughlak would desecrate temples upon the conquest of new territory as a symbol of victory of Islam. One some occasions a particularly fanatical Muslim king like Sikander Lodi would in a fit of paranoia desecrate or destroy temples even in peaceful times.
"In 1669 Aurangzeb issued a general order for the destruction of Hindu temples." As per rough estimates about 3000 (Three Thousand) temples were destroyed and converted into Mosques in the 750 years of Muslim rule in India. But let bygones be bygones. The fact is mentioned here only to set the record straight. In my personal view all such controversial structures should be taken possession of by an educational trust and be converted into schools to preach the unity of Humankind. And eventually not just such controversial structures, but all places of religious worship should cease to be prayer houses and should be used to house schools for humanist and rationalist education. (This obviously is the author's personal view)
"During the sultanate and later under Aurangzeb, many hundreds of thousands of Hindus were forcibly converted to Islam. Shah Jahan appointed a superintendent of converts charged with the special responsibility for making converts. The sentences of criminals and prisoners of war were readily remitted and the individuals were granted daily allowances upon embracing Islam. The conversion of Muslims to Hinduism, on the other hand, constituted the crime of apostasy and was punished by death. The Jaziya, a special tax levied on all non-Muslims, was both a heavy financial -burden and a badge of inferiority borne by the Hindu; it also stimulated conversions to Islam.
The Quww'at-ul-Islam Mosque (Power of Islam).
This Mosque which stands in the Kutub Minar complex was built by Kutub-ud-din Aibak, the first Muslim ruler of Delhi. The Quww'at-ul-Islam Mosque (Power of Islam) is the first mosque erected in India by Muslim invaders after the Islamic aggression of India. This Mosque was built with the columns from destroyed Hindu and Jain temples. It stands at the site of Pithoragarh which was the capital of Prithiviraj Chauhan the last Hindu ruler of Delhi.
Thus, during the 11 centuries of Mohammedan rule a significant portion of our countrymen had to change their religion by force of circumstances. And in 4 erstwhile Indian Provinces viz. West Punjab, Sindh, East Bengal and NWFP the Muslim converts came to constitute a majority by the present century. The multi-religious character of India is largely an ugly litter of intolerance, persecution, penal taxes, conversion of faith at the point of the sword, discriminatory civil and criminal laws, defilement and conversion of places of worship from that of one faith to another, all of which the country witnessed during the eleven centuries of Muslim rule.
The Psychological Damage to the Hindu Mind
The Hindus suffered immense psychic damage. The Muslims also plundered the wealth of the Hindu kingdoms, impoverished the Hindu populace, and destroyed thc prosperity of India. The Psychological damage to the Hindu Mind, due to Muslim rule, was immense and unmeasurable.
Today after a gap of one thousand years, the innate spirit of humanness that is the basis of Hindu Culture can again breathe freely and it is about time that we recollect it and the successes it propelled the human mind to achieve. The human mind embodied in the ancient sages, rishis, munis and sanyasis - scientists in modern parlance.
We need to remember our past clearly and vividly, lest we forget, our capability to contribute to the repository of human knowledge, lest we forget our capability to activate the indomitable human mind residing within us, lest we forget our humane instincts that gave us a sagacious and charitable view of life along with progress - economic, technological and material. All that which goes under the term CIVILIZATION.
The human spirit in Ancient India has given to the world, the values of non-violence, religious tolerance, renunciation alongwith many elements of knowledge in fields like production technology, mechanical engineering, shipbuilding, navigation, architecture, civil engineering, medical science, physics, chemistry, logic, astronomy, mathematics and so on.
We have to live up to this legacy that can help human beings in all corners of our globe to rejuvenate our spirit not to conquer one another, but to conquer oneself; not to destroy, but to build; not to hate, but to love; not to isolate oneself, but to integrate everyone into one global society and to achieve much more in the future to enrich human civilisation to result in: "The maximum welfare of the maximum number" or as in Sanskrit it is called:
"Loko Samasto Sukhino Bhavantu" and "Samasta Janaanaam Sukhino Bhavantu."
Now let us see what Different Historians have to say about the Hindu
Holocaust.
Send in your feedback to the compiler:
[email protected]
________________________
View the Table of Contents
We welcome your comments on this webpage
You may view what others have said about this webpage
______________________________________________
We invite you to use our Message Board to start a discussion on any relevant
topic
We invite you to participate in an online chat in our Hindu History
Chatroom.
This page has been awarded the "Best of the Historians Pod Award" by Tripod - a premier web-hosting site
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This Hindu Webring site owned by SudheerBirodkar
Search WWW Search hindutwa.com Search sudheerb.tripod.com
Het grondgebied der nederlanden is heilig voor elke oernederlander.
Hoeveel recht heb ik dan als (Hindoe)schrijver om dit grondgebied te ontheiligen?
Kritisch Podium Dewanand
https://www.dewanand.nl |
|
|
|
|
onderzoek
197 Posts
|
Posted-21 Feb 2004: 13:48:43
|
quote:
Originally posted by SoS
Hoewel volledig mee eens, in ieder geval inzake de extremistische versies, maar lijkt het me geen haalbare kaart, vanwege:
1. een rechtsorde die niet meer dan 1 miljoen van haar volk in het harnas gaat jagen
2. een rechtsorde die dit op voorhand zal zien als een aanval op de geliefde multikul samenleving
3. gevaar voor internationale positie, verdragen, handelsrelaties
4. gegarandeerde uitnodiging voor megaprotesten, stakingen, enorme sociale onrust, burgeroorlog
5. gelijke monniken/kappen verhaal, de bijbel en al het andere religieuze materiaal gaan dan ook in discussie
6. iets wat je verbied zal ondergronds gaan, nog extremer, bv. aanslagen tegen de staat/initiatiefnemers etc. etc.
Kortom, gedurfd plan, maar ook gevaarlijk indien het lukt!
In het geheel niet, mischien is gevaarlijk als het niet lukt.
Toch even over je opmerking "...1. een rechtsorde die niet meer dan 1 miljoen van haar volk in het harnas gaat jagen.." die 1 miljoen Islamieten op een paar na dan mischien zijn geen onderdeel van het "eigen" Volk.
Het verhaal handels relaties stoten me tegen de borst daar als het hier om economische factoren gaat dan is het Nederlandse volk en haar Identiteit niets anders als handelswaar hetgeen overeen komt met een oud tweede wereld oorlog liedje "..Op de hoek van de straat staat XXX, het is een patjepeeer, hij verkoopt zijn volk en vaderland of een paar centen..."
"...4. gegarandeerde uitnodiging voor megaprotesten, stakingen, enorme sociale onrust, burgeroorlog..." niemand zegt dat het gevarenvrij zou zijn, maar als je het niet doet dan geef je je bij voorbaat gewonnen, diegene die dat voorstaat verdijnt in slavernij te leven.
Kijk in je hart en haal je moed weer naar boven.
|
|
|
|
|
onderzoek
197 Posts
|
Posted-21 Feb 2004: 13:54:24
|
quote:
Originally posted by dewanand
waarom wachten, als er rechtsgeldige bewijzen zijn om deze rechtszaak te winnen?
mein kampf is ook verboden in Nederland op grond van de haatteksten. neo-nazisten worden vervolgd hierom en alle neonazistische organisaties zijn in principe verboden.
hetzelfde argument geldt dan ook voor moslims, want die kunnen ook als neonazisten beschouwd worden.
Goed zo, en ook bedankt voor de lange lappen tekst die ik dadelijk op mijn gemak ga doorspitten. Natuurlijk zijn er argumenten en ik denk dat we zo'n rechtzaak kunnen winnen. Hoe dan ook we moeten het doen we zijn verplicht het te doen.
Indien Mein Kampf verboden kan worden dan kan dit met de Koran ook, want indien niet zou er met twee maten gemeten zijn hetgeen juridisch toch eigelijk niet zou moeten kunnen.
|
|
|
|
|
Vrijestem
3049 Posts
|
Posted-21 Feb 2004: 15:52:20
|
Dat er met twee maten werd gemeten hebben sommigen hierop deze site tot vervelends toegeroepen. Die gasten werden jammer genoeg geblokkeerd omdat ze zgn moslims aan het beledigen waren. Nu komt
Dewanand met hetzelfde en men begrijpt het nu wel. Waarom???
Nou Dew hiervoor moet ik je wel een pluim geven.
In Nederland zijn Kerk en Staat gescheiden. Dus de scheiding van Moskee en staat gaat helemaal op en daarmee ook de Koran.
E Pluribus Unum |
Edited by - Vrijestem on 21 Feb 2004 15:54:11
|
|
|
|
|
Robbie409
7258 Posts
|
Posted-21 Feb 2004: 16:35:55
|
Ik lees geen beledigingen in deze thread.
Wel feiten en waarheden.
I want my money back!!  |
|
|
|
|
Marjan Duijsens
Netherlands
9196 Posts
|
Posted-21 Feb 2004: 16:47:21
|
Ach vrije heb jij dat dan ook ervaren, dat er met twee maten gemeten werd? Wanneer mensen persoonlijk worden en een bepaalde geloofsovertuiging gebruiken, of een bepaald kleurtje om duidelijk grievend bezig te zijn, of via PM medeforumleden menen te mogen uitschelden, dan hebben we daar inderdaad iets op tegen.
De meeste mensen worden tijdelijk van het forum buitengesloten op basis van forumregel 4. Dat men het anders ervaart daar kunnen wij ook niet zoveel aan doen. Van ons mag je bijna alles zeggen, zolang je het maar niet over de persoonlijke boeg gooit en dat zie ik hier niet gebeuren.
'il n'y a que les imbciles qui ne changent pas d'avis' (Alleen imbecielen veranderen niet van mening).
Groetjes Marjan |
|
|
|
|
Vrijestem
3049 Posts
|
Posted-21 Feb 2004: 17:17:59
|
Beste Marjan,
Mensen niet begrijpen is ook een zwakte van de mens. En waar ik het over heb is dat die persoon werd geblokkeerd omdat men hem niet begreep. Dat is niet leuk. Zie ook maar hoe deze Dew op deze site is komen aandansen. Desondanks heeft ie nu toch wel begrip en aandacht. Terwijl die ander gewoon werd verketterd.
E Pluribus Unum |
|
|
|
|
sinbad
26 Posts
|
Posted-22 Feb 2004: 17:39:54
|
Goed idee dewanand,
Doe samen met de koran ook gelijk de bijbel erbij.
Zo sla je twee vliegen in een klap.
Sinbad. |
|
|
|
|
ancarlo
Italy
3102 Posts
|
Posted-22 Feb 2004: 19:05:40 
|
Waarom Sinbad?????
Ben je ook op de site bezig van saoudi arabia etc. waar de bijbel, het kruis je al de gevangenis gaat kosten???
Hoezo mag die wereld alles bepalen wat wel en niet kan in hun land, en Europa en nu specifiek Nederland niet????? Leg dat eens even uit??
En niet komen met Nederland is een democratie (niet misbruiken als je het uit komt, hadden we het al over!!!!!!) of de scheiding tussen staat en religie?????
Gewoon eerlijk je mening geven Waarom het wel mag van een islamitisch land om te bepalen dat er geen kruizen/keppeltjes/bijbels en thora's binnen mogen komen en daar een heel zware straf op staat, en Europa mag dat niet, ten opzichte van een ander geloof??????
Angelica
Tolerantie wekt Intolerantie op bij die gene die niet weten wat tolerantie is! |
|
|
|
|
Arnold
Netherlands
3105 Posts
|
Posted-22 Feb 2004: 22:59:50
|
quote:
Originally posted by sinbad
Goed idee dewanand,
Doe samen met de koran ook gelijk de bijbel erbij.
Zo sla je twee vliegen in een klap.
Sinbad.
Volkomen mee eens. Als atheist (ook een soort geloof maar dan zonder 'wetboek') kan ik me daar prima in vinden. En de mensheid zal er van profiteren.
Arnold
team www.Pim-Fortuyn.nl
|
|
|
|
|
Edris420
7 Posts
|
Posted-23 Feb 2004: 00:24:04
|
quote:
Originally posted by Tjeerd
Hoe staan moslims tegenover hindoes?
tjeerd wij moslims accepteren andere geloof
|
|
|
|
|
VanToeten
4014 Posts
|
Posted-23 Feb 2004: 00:29:58
|
quote:
Originally posted by sinbad
Goed idee dewanand,
Doe samen met de koran ook gelijk de bijbel erbij.
Zo sla je twee vliegen in een klap.
Sinbad.
Nou ja verbieden.
Het bijzondere onderwijs opheffen. Dat zou een mooie eerste stap zijn. Het christendom is wat dat aangaat de bondgenoot van de islam.
_________________________________________________
En overigens vind ik dat er zwaar op de zorrug moet worden bezuinigd.
|
|
|
|
|
Gnarfie
132 Posts
|
Posted-23 Feb 2004: 00:35:13
|
quote:
wij moslims accepteren andere geloof
mooi..
kunnen we weer fijn aan de miswijn op een zonnig terrasje in downtown mekka..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic |
|
|
|
Rechtszaak: Koran verbieden
